atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Attention and transformers

Closest Neighbors are Harmful for Lightweight Masked Auto-encoders

CVPR 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Attention and transformers · approach: Vision transformer design · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes NoR-MAE, which adds a neighbor-repelling decorrelation loss between visible patches and their closest neighbor patches to train lightweight ViTs from scratch with masked autoencoding, without a teacher model.

Problem

Masked autoencoder pre-training yields poor representations for lightweight vision transformers (e.g., ViT-Tiny), and existing fixes rely on costly knowledge distillation from large teachers.

Approach

Defines the closest neighbor patch (CNP) for each visible patch and penalizes off-diagonal correlations between embeddings of visible patches and their CNPs, reducing semantic aliasing between local semantic centroids; trained from scratch with negligible overhead.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add closest-neighbor repelling lossMAE with ViT-Tiny · ImageNet-1Ksupervised fine-tuning accuracy (%): 66.60 -> 70.24 (+3.64)Helped
add closest-neighbor repelling lossMAE with ViT-Tiny · ImageNet-100supervised fine-tuning accuracy (%): 71.04 -> 78.26 (+7.22)Helped
add closest-neighbor repelling lossMAE with ViT-Tiny · CIFAR-10accuracy (%): 95.01 -> 95.98Helped
add closest-neighbor repelling lossMAE with ViT-Tiny · ADE20KmIoU: 26.54 -> 33.54Helped
use the reported neighbor-repelling penalty settings across λ values (ablation)NoR-MAE with ViT-Tiny · ImageNet-100accuracy (%): 70.24; 76.20; 78.26; 77.89; 72.17Mixed
vary patch size from 2×2 to 32×32 (ablation)NoR-MAE with ViT-Tiny · ImageNet-100accuracy (%): 83.56%; 83.58%; 79.24%; 78.26%; 74.73%Mixed
vary masking ratio from 50% to 85% (ablation)NoR-MAE with ViT-Tiny · ImageNet-1Kaccuracy (%): 69.27%; 70.24%; 70.16%No clear effect
increase pre-training from 200 to 1,000 or 1,600 epochs (ablation)NoR-MAE with ViT-Tiny · ImageNet-100accuracy (%): 78.26 -> 82.97 -> 83.96Helped
add closest-neighbor repelling lossMAE with ViT-Tiny · CIFAR-100accuracy (%): 78.74 -> 80.13Helped
add closest-neighbor repelling lossMAE with ViT-Tiny · DTDaccuracy (%): 55.07 -> 60.18Helped
add closest-neighbor repelling lossMAE with ViT-Tiny · Flowersaccuracy (%): 85.80 -> 88.71Helped
add closest-neighbor repelling lossMAE with ViT-Tiny · Petsaccuracy (%): 82.47 -> 85.29Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet-1K ImageNet-100 CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 Flowers Pets DTD Food Caltech-101 Aircraft ADE20K

Benchmarks: ImageNet-1K ImageNet-100 CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 Flowers Pets DTD Food Caltech-101 Aircraft ADE20K

Metrics: top-1 accuracy mIoU

Baselines: MAE DMAE SupMAE CrossMAE U-MAE MoCo-V3 DINO SimMIM MaskFeat PeCo BEiT

Builds on: masked autoencoder (MAE) Barlow Twins U-MAE DMAE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy