atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Classifier-to-Bias: Toward Unsupervised Automatic Bias Detection for Visual Classifiers

CVPR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Data augmentation and generalization bias · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes C2B, a training-free, label-free pipeline that uses an LLM to propose bias attributes/captions and CLIP or Bing retrieval to build test sets for scoring biases of pre-trained visual classifiers.

Problem

Identifying biases of pre-trained visual classifiers when no labeled task-specific dataset is available, given only a textual task description.

Approach

Use an LLM to generate bias attributes, classes, and target-bias captions from the task description, retrieve images for those captions from a large database (CC12M via CLIP or Bing web search), and score biases by per-class accuracy differences of the classifier on the retrieved pseudo-labeled images.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace B2T with C2B using Bing retrievalFaceXFormer bias detection · CelebAHIT (%): 4.53 -> 12.29Helped
Replace B2T with C2B using CC12M retrievalFaceXFormer bias detection · CelebAVQA agreement: 0.10 -> 0.25Helped
Replace B2T with C2B using CC12M retrievalResNet50 V2 bias detection · ImageNet-XHIT (%): 2.40 -> 11.18Helped
Replace B2T with C2B using Bing retrievalViT B 16 SWAG bias detection · ImageNet-XVQA agreement: 0.20 -> 0.32Helped
Replace B2T with C2B using Bing retrievalFaceXFormer bias detection · CelebAFH (%): 3.14 -> 6.88Hurt
Use CC12M retrieval instead of Bing retrieval (ablation)C2B · ImageNet-XHIT (%): 7.80 -> 11.18; 7.91 -> 11.21; 7.53 -> 11.10; 7.72 -> 10.85Helped
Use Bing retrieval instead of CC12M retrieval (ablation)C2B · CelebAHIT (%): 10.76 -> 12.29Helped
Use Bing retrieval instead of CC12M retrieval (ablation)C2B · ImageNet-XVQA agreement: 0.20 -> 0.26; 0.20 -> 0.28; 0.20 -> 0.28; 0.21 -> 0.32Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CelebA ImageNet-1K ImageNet-X CC12M

Benchmarks: CelebA ImageNet-X

Metrics: HIT rate false hit rate miss rate VQA agreement score recall@K for retrieval

Baselines: B2T

Builds on: Bias-to-Text (B2T) CLIP Conceptual Captions 12M

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy