atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / 3D detection and driving

CaMuViD: Calibration-Free Multi-View Detection

CVPR 2025 · Detection and segmentation › 3D detection and driving · approach: Multi-camera BEV detection · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CaMuViD, a calibration-free multi-view pedestrian detector that learns feature projection and back-projection matrices with a fine-tuned InternImage backbone and cascade R-CNN head, detecting directly in image space.

Problem

Multi-view pedestrian detection in crowds relies on camera calibration and BEV ground-plane projection, which causes feature distortion, overfitting, and poor generalization across camera setups.

Approach

Replace geometric calibration-based projection with learned fully connected networks that estimate per-view projection matrices (and their inverses as back-projection matrices) on feature maps, fuse views in a common space by concatenation, and detect bounding boxes directly in each camera image.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use CaMuViD instead of MVFPMulti-view pedestrian detection · WildtrackMODA: 94.1 -> 95.0Helped
Use CaMuViD instead of MVFPMulti-view pedestrian detection · MultiviewXMODA: 95.7 -> 96.5Helped
Train on MultiviewX and test on Wildtrack with CaMuViD instead of MVFPCross-dataset multi-view detection · Wildtrack (trained on MultiviewX)MODA: 76.7 -> 86.4Helped
Replace summation fusion with concatenation (ablation)CaMuViD without FRM · WildtrackMODA: 93.8 -> 94.6Helped
Add the Feature Refinement Module after concatenation fusion (ablation)CaMuViD · WildtrackMODA: 94.6 -> 95.0Helped
Add the Feature Refinement Module after concatenation fusion (ablation)CaMuViD · WildtrackMODP: 80.2% to 80.9%Helped
Replace learned projection matrices with camera parameter-based projections (ablation)CaMuViD · WildtrackMODA: 95.0% -> 9.1%Hurt
Remove camera views, using only C1 instead of all seven cameras (ablation)CaMuViD · WildtrackMODA: 95.0 -> 60.1Hurt
Use only cameras C1–C2 instead of all seven cameras (ablation)CaMuViD · WildtrackMODA: 95.0 -> 77.8Hurt
Use only cameras C1–C3 instead of all seven cameras (ablation)CaMuViD · WildtrackMODA: 95.0 -> 90.6Hurt
Use only cameras C1–C4 instead of all seven cameras (ablation)CaMuViD · WildtrackMODA: 95.0 -> 93.8Hurt
Use only cameras C1–C5 instead of all seven cameras (ablation)CaMuViD · WildtrackMODA: 95.0 -> 93.8Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Wildtrack MultiviewX

Benchmarks: Wildtrack MultiviewX

Metrics: MODA MODP precision recall F1

Baselines: MVDet Deep-Occlusion DeepMCD POM-CNN SHOT MVDeTr MVAug 3DROM MVFP TrackTacular GMVD

Builds on: InternImage MVDet Cascade R-CNN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy