atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Audio-Visual Semantic Graph Network for Audio-Visual Event Localization

CVPR 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Audio-visual source localization · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes AVSGN, which uses shared text labels from frozen CLIP/CLAP encoders with attention-based cross-modal semantic alignment and a three-subgraph cross-modal graph interaction module for audio-visual event localization on AVE.

Problem

Audio-visual event localization (AVEL) suffers from semantic inconsistency between heterogeneous audio and visual modalities and from weak cross-temporal dependency modeling.

Approach

Introduces shared semantic text labels (from CLIP and CLAP text encoders) as a bridge, aligns visual, audio and text features via attention in a shared space (CMSA), and disentangles cross-modal interactions into audio-text, audio-visual and visual-text GCN subgraphs (CMGI).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add AVSGN with CMSA and CMGI instead of DG-SCTAVE localization with Swin-V2-L and HTS-AT · AVE, fully-supervisedaccuracy: 82.2 -> 83.1Helped
Add AVSGN instead of CSS-NetAVE localization · AVE, weakly-supervisedaccuracy: 76.8 -> 78.8Helped
Add pseudo intra-modal alignment (ablation)AVSGN · AVE, fully-supervised and weakly-supervisedaccuracy: 82.8 -> 83.1; 78.5 -> 78.8Helped
Add cross-modal visual alignment (ablation)AVSGN · AVE, fully-supervised and weakly-supervisedaccuracy: 80.4 -> 83.1; 76.0 -> 78.8Helped
Add cross-modal audio alignment (ablation)AVSGN · AVE, fully-supervised and weakly-supervisedaccuracy: 81.8 -> 83.1; 77.2 -> 78.8Helped
Add cross-modal text alignment (ablation)AVSGN · AVE, fully-supervised and weakly-supervisedaccuracy: 82.3 -> 83.1; 77.8 -> 78.8Helped
Add audio-visual subgraph (ablation)AVSGN CMGI · AVE, fully-supervised and weakly-supervisedaccuracy: 80.3 -> 83.1; 75.9 -> 78.8Helped
Add visual-text subgraph (ablation)AVSGN CMGI · AVE, fully-supervised and weakly-supervisedaccuracy: 81.7 -> 83.1; 76.6 -> 78.8Helped
Add audio-text subgraph (ablation)AVSGN CMGI · AVE, fully-supervised and weakly-supervisedaccuracy: 82.5 -> 83.1; 78.0 -> 78.8Helped
Add audio-visual gate loss (ablation)AVSGN · AVE, fully-supervisedaccuracy: 81.7 -> 83.1Helped
Add semantic consistency loss (ablation)AVSGN · AVE, fully-supervisedaccuracy: 82.0 -> 83.1Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: AVE

Benchmarks: AVE

Metrics: segment-level classification accuracy

Baselines: AVEL CMBS CSS-Net LAVISH DG-SCT VSCG DMIN CMRAN

Builds on: CLIP CLAP AVEL CMBS LAVISH

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy