atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

ADU: Adaptive Detection of Unknown Categories in Black-Box Domain Adaptation

CVPR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Source-free domain adaptation · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ADU, a black-box domain adaptation framework for open-partial and open-set settings that uses selective amplification knowledge distillation and entropy-driven label differentiation with an average-entropy threshold to detect unknown target classes.

Problem

Black-box domain adaptation assumes identical label sets across domains, which fails when the target domain contains unknown classes; existing methods suffer from noisy pseudo-labels in knowledge distillation and fixed thresholds for detecting unknown categories.

Approach

Scales the knowledge distillation loss by a confidence-dependent modulating term (1+p_s)^θ to emphasize high-confidence source-API pseudo-labels, refines pseudo-labels by EMA, and separates high- and low-quality target predictions by entropy with an adaptive mean-entropy threshold, using negative learning on high-quality labels to widen the gap for unknown classes.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace UB2DA with ADUBlack-box domain adaptation · OfficeHome OPBDA (Avg.)H-score (%): 70.4 -> 72.2Helped
replace UB2DA with ADUBlack-box domain adaptation · Office31 OPBDA (Avg.)H-score (%): 86.9 -> 88.1Helped
replace UB2DA with ADUBlack-box domain adaptation · VisDA OPBDAH-score (%): 45.2 -> 48.7Helped
replace UB2DA with ADUBlack-box domain adaptation · DomainNet OPBDA (Avg.)H-score (%): 49.3 -> 51.0Helped
replace UB2DA with ADUBlack-box domain adaptation · OfficeHome OSBDA (Avg.)H-score (%): 69.1 -> 71.1Helped
replace UB2DA with ADUBlack-box domain adaptation · Office31 OSBDA (Avg.)H-score (%): 87.1 -> 88.1Helped
replace UB2DA with ADUBlack-box domain adaptation · VisDA OSBDAH-score (%): 48.1 -> 50.8Helped
add negative loss to LHQ (ablation)SAKD-only ADU · Office31 OPBDA ablation (Avg. of listed tasks)H-score (%): 73.7 -> 74.6Helped
add entropy loss to LHQ (ablation)SAKD-only ADU · Office31 OPBDA ablation (Avg. of listed tasks)H-score (%): 73.7 -> 74.5Helped
add low-quality-label loss (ablation)SAKD-only ADU · Office31 OPBDA ablation (Avg. of listed tasks)H-score (%): 73.7 -> 74.8Helped
include all EDLD loss components (ablation)SAKD-only ADU · Office31 OPBDA ablation (Avg. of listed tasks)H-score (%): 73.7 -> 76.3Helped
add negative loss to LHQ (ablation)ADU without negative loss · Office31 OPBDA ablation (Avg. of listed tasks)H-score (%): 75.2 -> 76.3Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Office31 OfficeHome VisDA DomainNet

Benchmarks: Office31 OfficeHome VisDA DomainNet

Metrics: H-score

Baselines: No Adapt. DINE BETA SEAL UB2DA

Builds on: DINE UB2DA Negative Learning knowledge distillation H-score evaluation

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy