atlas

Research map / Image generation / Super-resolution

ADD: Attribution-Driven Data Augmentation Framework for Boosting Image Super-Resolution

CVPR 2025 · Image generation › Super-resolution · approach: Perceptual and real-world SR · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Calibrated Attribution Maps (CAM) for saliency estimation in super-resolution and two saliency-guided data augmentation methods (ADD and ADD+) that paste high-saliency patches across LR-HR pairs to boost SR networks.

Problem

Vanilla data augmentation in low-level vision such as super-resolution causes information loss (flat regions, simple edges), and existing saliency methods (LAM, integrated gradients) are noisy and do not transfer well to SR-based data augmentation.

Approach

A Calibrated Attribution Map combines a Sobel-based global feature detector with calibrated path-integrated gradients over Gaussian-blurred baselines to produce cleaner SR saliency maps; these maps select patches that are cut and mixed across LR-HR pairs (ADD/ADD+) to add diverse degradation patterns.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ADD+ during trainingSwinIR · Urban100 ×2PSNR (dB): 33.29 -> 33.55 (+0.26)Helped
Use ADD+ during trainingSwinIR · RealSR ×4PSNR: 29.26 -> 29.43 (+0.17)Helped
Use ADD during trainingEDSR · LIVE1 q=10PSNR: 30.14 -> 30.15No clear effect
Use ADD during trainingEDSR · LIVE1 q=20PSNR: 31.83 -> 32.31Helped
Use ADD during trainingEDSR · LIVE1 q=30PSNR: 32.45 -> 33.44Helped
Use 1×1 patch granularity instead of the EDSR baseline (ablation)EDSR · DIV2K ×4PSNR: 29.21 -> 29.28 (+0.07)Helped
Use 2×2 patch granularity instead of the EDSR baseline (ablation)EDSR · DIV2K ×4PSNR: 29.21 -> 29.26 (+0.05)Helped
Use 3×3 patch granularity instead of the EDSR baseline (ablation)EDSR · DIV2K ×4PSNR: 29.21 -> 29.24 (+0.03)Helped
Use 4×4 patch granularity instead of the EDSR baseline (ablation)EDSR · DIV2K ×4PSNR: 29.21 -> 29.22 (+0.01)No clear effect
Use finer patch granularities (5×5–7×7) instead of the EDSR baseline (ablation)EDSR · DIV2K ×4PSNR: 29.14; 29.07; 28.92Hurt
Add the global feature detector (ablation)EDSR CAM · DIV2K validationgradient count at step 50: 120.0k -> 869.1kHelped
Add the global feature detector (ablation)RCAN CAM · DIV2K validationgradient count at step 50: 987.3k -> 1291.3kHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DIV2K RealSR LIVE1

Benchmarks: Set5 Set14 BSD100 Urban100 Manga109 RealSR DIV2K LIVE1

Metrics: PSNR SSIM insertion/deletion curves diffusion index

Baselines: CutMix CutMixup CutBlur LAM vanilla DA

Builds on: LAM integrated gradients CutBlur CutMix Mixup

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy