Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Robot action and navigation
Vision-and-Language Navigation via Causal Learning
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes GOAT, a generalized cross-modal causal transformer for vision-and-language navigation that applies back-door and front-door adjustments (BACL, FACL) plus a contrastively trained cross-modal feature pooling module to mitigate observable and unobservable dataset confounders.
Problem
Dataset bias causes VLN agents to overfit to seen environments and spurious correlations, hurting generalization to unseen environments.
Approach
Builds a structural causal model with observable (room references, keywords) and unobservable (style-related) confounders across vision, language, and history, and applies back-door adjustment to observable confounders and front-door adjustment (via learned confounder dictionaries from contrastively trained attentive pooling) to unobservable ones, intervening on intermediate features rather than o
Key results
- On R2R test unseen, GOAT reaches 74.57 SR and 64.94 SPL versus BEVBert's 73 SR and 62 SPL.
- On REVERIE test unseen, GOAT reports 57.72 SR and 26.70 RGSPL, ahead of BEVBert's 52.81 SR and 22.09 RGSPL.
- Ablation on R2R val-unseen: BACL alone and FACL alone each improve SR over the 75.27 baseline, and combining both reaches 77.82 SR and 68.13 SPL.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add BACL to GOAT without BACL or FACL (ablation) | GOAT · R2R validation unseen | SR: 75.27 -> 76.37 | Helped |
| Add FACL to GOAT without BACL or FACL (ablation) | GOAT · R2R validation unseen | SR: 75.27 -> 76.50 | Helped |
| Add BACL and FACL together (ablation) | GOAT · R2R validation unseen | SR: 75.27 -> 77.82 | Helped |
| Add CFP as a pre-training auxiliary task (ablation) | GOAT · R2R pre-training | SR: 40.36 -> 43.47 | Helped |
| Use trained CFP attention modules rather than average pooling for dictionary features (ablation) | GOAT · R2R validation unseen | SPL: 66.17 -> 68.13 | Helped |
| Use statistic-based BACL for both text and vision (ablation) | GOAT BACL · R2R validation unseen | SPL: 64.78 | Hurt |
| Use statistic-based BACL for text and attention-based BACL for vision (ablation) | GOAT BACL · R2R validation unseen | SPL: 65.39 | Hurt |
| Use attention-based BACL for text and statistic-based BACL for vision (ablation) | GOAT BACL · R2R validation unseen | SPL: 64.78 -> 68.13 | Helped |
| Use attention-based BACL for both text and vision (ablation) | GOAT BACL · R2R validation unseen | SPL: 68.13 -> 65.83 | Hurt |
| Apply GOAT rather than GridMM | VLN navigation · R2R validation unseen | SPL: 64 -> 68.13 | Helped |
| Apply GOAT rather than GridMM | VLN object navigation · REVERIE validation unseen | RGSPL: 24.56 -> 26.09 | Helped |
| Apply GOAT rather than VLN-PETL | VLN navigation · RxR-English validation unseen | SPL: 54.2 -> 61.7 | Helped |
Surprising findings
- Attention-based back-door adjustment works best for text while statistic-based works best for vision, with the combined attention-attention variant performing worse than the mixed setting.
Limitations
- Intervention relies on hand-built confounder dictionaries (keywords, room types) whose quality depends on external tools like BLIP and part-of-speech tagging.
- Pre-training uses a single V100 GPU and relies on speaker-generated synthetic data and EnvEdit augmentation, so gains depend on these components.
Experimental setup
Datasets: R2R REVERIE RxR-English SOON synthetic extended datasets
Benchmarks: R2R REVERIE RxR-English SOON
Metrics: SR SPL NE OSR RGS RGSPL nDTW sDTW
Baselines: HAMT DUET TD-STP GeoVLN DSRG GridMM GELA EnvEdit BEVBert
Builds on: DUET METER BEVBert CLIP RoBERTa
Closest papers by meaning
- From Prompts to Tokens: Internalizing Causal Supervision in Vision-Language Model for Multi-Image Causal Reasoning (ICML 2026 · similarity 0.88)
- Causal Tracing of Object Representations in Large Vision Language Models: Mechanistic Interpretability and Hallucination Mitigation (AAAI 2026 · similarity 0.87)
- The Abstraction Gap in Vision-Language Causal Reasoning (ICML 2026 · similarity 0.86)
- Learning Invariant Causal Mechanism from Vision-Language Models (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.86)
- A Causal Marriage between VLM and IRM from Understanding to Reasoning (CVPR 2026 · similarity 0.86)
- OVER-NAV: Elevating Iterative Vision-and-Language Navigation with Open-Vocabulary Detection and StructurEd Representation (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.86)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
