atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / CNN features

Unleashing Channel Potential: Space-Frequency Selection Convolution for SAR Object Detection

CVPR 2024 · Detection and segmentation › CNN features · approach: Context for hard detection conditions · 74 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SFS-Conv, a convolution module that shunts channels into spatial (multi-scale residual kernels) and frequency (fractional Gabor) branches and fuses them parameter-free, and builds the lightweight SFS-CNet detector for SAR object detection.

Problem

Standard convolutions in DCNN-based SAR object detectors extract redundant features and are computationally expensive, while existing lightweight or compression methods degrade detection accuracy.

Approach

A shunt-perceive-select convolution that splits input channels into a spatial branch (multi-scale hierarchical-residual kernels with expanding receptive fields) and a frequency branch (convolution kernels modulated by fractional Gabor filters), then fuses them via a parameter-free channel-wise soft-attention selection, increasing feature diversity within a single layer without adding channels.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the OGL strategySFS-CNet · HRSIDAP50: 95.7 -> 96.2Helped
Use the OGL strategySFS-CNet · SAR-AIRcraft-1.0mAP: 88.7 -> 89.7Helped
Use the OGL strategySFS-CNet · SSDDAP50: 99.4 -> 99.6Helped
Set shunt ratio α to 0 instead of α=1/2 (ablation)SFS-Conv · HRSID testAP50: 95.71 % -> 94.80 %Hurt
Set shunt ratio α to 1/4 instead of α=1/2 (ablation)SFS-Conv · HRSID testAP50: 95.71 % -> 95.73 %No clear effect
Set shunt ratio α to 3/4 instead of α=1/2 (ablation)SFS-Conv · HRSID testAP50: 95.71 % -> 95.38 %Hurt
Set shunt ratio α to 1 instead of α=1/2 (ablation)SFS-Conv · HRSID testAP50: 95.71 % -> 94.55 %Hurt
Add SPU and FPU instead of ordinary 3×3 convolution (ablation)SFS-Conv · HRSID testAP50: 90.39 % -> 95.71 %Helped
Add FPU to SPU-only SFS-Conv (ablation)SFS-Conv · HRSID testAP50: 94.66% -> 95.71%Helped
Add SPU to FPU-only SFS-Conv (ablation)SFS-Conv · HRSID testAP50: 94.45% -> 95.71%Helped
Add channel selection instead of no feature selection (ablation)SFS-Conv · HRSID testAP50: 94.68 % -> 95.71 %Helped
Replace channel selection with spatial selection (ablation)SFS-Conv · HRSID testAP50: 95.71 % -> 95.82 %No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: HRSID SAR-AIRcraft-1.0 SSDD

Benchmarks: HRSID SAR-AIRcraft-1.0 SSDD

Metrics: AP50 AP75 mAP precision recall F1 params FLOPs inference time

Baselines: Faster R-CNN Mask R-CNN Cascade R-CNN HTC RetinaNet FCOS CenterNet YOLOv5n YOLOv5s YOLOv8n YOLOv8s YOLO-FA

Builds on: YOLOv8 Gabor transform Res2Net-style hierarchical residual connections LSKNet DGNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy