atlas

Research map / Image generation / Editing and style transfer

StegoGAN: Leveraging Steganography for Non-Bijective Image-to-Image Translation

CVPR 2024 · Image generation › Editing and style transfer · approach: Image-to-image translation · 59 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes StegoGAN, a CycleGAN extension that makes steganography explicit in feature space via a learned unmatchability mask, so generators avoid hallucinating target-domain classes absent from the source domain.

Problem

Unpaired image-to-image translation between domains with non-bijective class correspondence (unmatchable classes present only in the target), where GANs hallucinate spurious objects and CycleGAN-style models hide information via steganography.

Approach

Split the generator's intermediate features into matchable and unmatchable parts using a learned mask, use the unmatchable part explicitly for reconstruction under noise perturbation, and enforce matchable consistency and sparse/binary mask regularization so that forward translations do not invent unmatchable classes.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use StegoGAN instead of CycleGANCycleGAN · PlanIGNRMSE: 27.0 -> 22.5Helped
use StegoGAN instead of CycleGANCycleGAN · PlanIGNAcc(σ1): 54.5 -> 66.1Helped
use StegoGAN instead of CycleGANCycleGAN · PlanIGNAcc(σ2): 57.6 -> 74.8Helped
use StegoGAN instead of the strongest baselinePlanIGN translation · PlanIGNFID: 60.2 -> 58.4Helped
use StegoGAN instead of the strongest baselinePlanIGN translation · PlanIGNKID: 2.2 -> 2.4Hurt
use StegoGAN instead of the strongest baselineBrats MRI Flair → T1 translation · Brats MRI Flair → T1RMSE: 39.8 -> 36.3Helped
use StegoGAN instead of the strongest baselineBrats MRI Flair → T1 translation · Brats MRI Flair → T1pFPR(‱): 15.1 -> 1.1Helped
use StegoGAN instead of the strongest baselineBrats MRI Flair → T1 translation · Brats MRI Flair → T1iFPR: 21.8 -> 4.2Helped
use StegoGAN instead of the strongest baselineBrats MRI Flair → T1 translation · Brats MRI Flair → T1FID: 58.9 -> 58.5Helped
use StegoGAN instead of the strongest baselineBrats MRI Flair → T1 translation · Brats MRI Flair → T1KID: 2.9 -> 2.4Helped
vary encoder depth from the full method's depth 1 (ablation)StegoGAN · PlanIGNRMSE: 22.5 -> 22.4 (depth -1); 22.5 -> 22.8 (depth 3); 22.5 -> 24.2 (depth 5); 22.5 -> 24.5 (depth 8)Mixed
add Lmatch (ablation)StegoGAN · GoogleMapsRMSE: 24.1 -> 22.7Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PlanIGN GoogleMaps Brats2018

Benchmarks: PlanIGN GoogleMaps Brats MRI

Metrics: RMSE Acc(σ1) Acc(σ2) FID KID pFPR iFPR

Baselines: CycleGAN DRIT GcGAN CUT SRUNIT

Builds on: CycleGAN CUT GcGAN DRIT SRUNIT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy