atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

Prompt-Driven Dynamic Object-Centric Learning for Single Domain Generalization

CVPR 2024 · Detection and segmentation › Open-set and few-shot detection · approach: Object-centric learning theory and video · 26 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a prompt-driven dynamic object-centric network for single-domain generalization, using CLIP text prompts to gate ResNet features via Slot-Attention fusion and spatial/channel masks, evaluated on PACS classification and urban-scene object detection.

Problem

Single-domain generalization fails because static networks cannot adapt to varying scene complexity across unseen target domains.

Approach

A prompt-based object-centric gating module fuses CLIP scene-prompt text embeddings with visual features via Slot-Attention to produce binary gating masks that dynamically select spatial and channel features in a ResNet backbone, regularized by a bound loss on mask density.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add dynamic gating network (no prompt, no Slot-Attention) over static ResNet-18 base (ablation)ResNet-18 on PACS · PACS single-DGAvg accuracy (%): 54.97 -> 64.27Helped
replace Slot-Attention fusion with traditional attention in the gating module (removing Slot-Attention) (ablation)prompt-based dynamic gating · PACS single-DGAvg accuracy (%): 71.12 -> 68.94 (normal attention, which is with prompt) ; Slot without prompt 66.81Hurt
remove prompt guidance from Slot-Attention gating (dynamic network with slot attention only) (ablation)prompt-based dynamic gating · PACS single-DGAvg accuracy (%): 71.12 -> 66.81Hurt
add prompt-based Slot-Attention object-centric gating on top of dynamic network (ablation)ResNet-18 on PACS · PACS single-DGAvg accuracy (%): 64.27 -> 71.12Helped
prompt-based object-centric dynamic network vs prior SOTAResNet-18 on PACS · PACS single-DGAvg accuracy (%): +1.2 over Meta-Casual (69.86 -> 71.12)Helped
prompt-based dynamic network applied to multi-domain generalizationResNet-18 on PACS · PACS multi-DGAvg accuracy (%): 88.07 vs 87.00 (Meta-Casual)Helped
prompt-based dynamic object-centric network on Diverse-Weather object detectionFaster-RCNN ResNet-101 · Diverse-Weather single-DG detection (average over target domains)mAP (%): 39.1 vs 38.5 (CLIP-Gap)Helped
prompt-based dynamic network on Night Rainy target domainFaster-RCNN ResNet-101 · Daytime Clear to Night RainymAP (%): 19.2 vs 18.7 (CLIP-Gap), +0.5Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PACS Diverse-Weather Dataset

Benchmarks: PACS Diverse-Weather Dataset

Metrics: classification accuracy mAP

Baselines: RSC RSC+ASR L2D P-RC Meta-Casual Faster-RCNN IBN-Net IterNorm SW ISW S-DGOD CLIP-Gap

Builds on: CLIP Slot-Attention Dynamic networks (gating) Verelst et al. bound loss CoCoOp

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy