atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Attention and transformers

Multiscale Vision Transformers Meet Bipartite Matching for Efficient Single-stage Action Localization

CVPR 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › Attention and transformers · approach: Vision transformer design · 12 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Trains a plain vision transformer (MViTv2-S, ViT-B) end-to-end for action localization by applying a DETR-style bipartite matching loss directly to output tokens, removing the external person detector, learnable queries and decoder.

Problem

Spatio-temporal action localization (joint person detection and action classification) is typically two-stage with an off-the-shelf detector, or single-stage with heavy DETR encoder-decoder heads; both are costly or hard to train.

Approach

Apply the OWL-ViT-style bipartite (Hungarian) matching loss directly to the spatio-temporal output tokens of a video transformer, with simple MLP heads for box, actor likelihood and action classes, so no learnable queries or decoder are needed; token selection (central frame for detection, temporal pooling for classification) pairs tokens across heads.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Train MViTv2-S with bipartite matching instead of RoI align on precomputed boxes (ablation)MViTv2-S on AVA 2.2 · AVA 2.2mAP: 26.8 -> 30.0Helped
Remove the last pooling layer (ablation)BMViT with MViTv2-S on AVA 2.2 · AVA 2.2mAP: 27.5 -> 30.0Helped
Use both central-frame tokens for detection and independently pooled past/future tokens for classification (2(C+T)) (ablation)BMViT on AVA 2.2 · AVA 2.2mAP: 29.1 -> 30.0Helped
Use all tokens without reduction (Singleton) rather than 2(C+T) token selection (ablation)BMViT on AVA 2.2 · AVA 2.2mAP: 30.0 -> 28.5Hurt
Use tubelet temporal pooling rather than 2(C+T) token selection (ablation)BMViT on AVA 2.2 · AVA 2.2mAP: 30.0 -> 28.7Hurt
Use max pooling over time for action tokens rather than 2(C+T) token selection (ablation)BMViT on AVA 2.2 · AVA 2.2mAP: 30.0 -> 28.3Hurt
Keep a variable input aspect ratio rather than resizing to a fixed aspect ratio (ablation)BMViT on AVA 2.2 · AVA 2.2mAP: 30.0 -> 28.5Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: AVA 2.2 UCF101-24 JHMDB51-21 Kinetics-400

Benchmarks: AVA 2.2 UCF101-24 JHMDB51-21

Metrics: mAP

Baselines: MViTv2-S with ROI align TubeR STMixer EVAD MeMViT WOO ACAR-Net VideoMAE Hiera-L two-stage

Builds on: DETR OWL-ViT MViTv2 VideoMAE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy