atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Masked Spatial Propagation Network for Sparsity-Adaptive Depth Refinement

CVPR 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Dataset condensation and flow estimation · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a sparsity-adaptive depth refinement (SDR) framework and masked spatial propagation network (MSPN) that refines monocular depth using a variable number of sparse depth points, also achieving SOTA on standard depth completion.

Problem

Depth completion models are trained with a fixed number of sparse depth measurements and degrade severely when sparsity (number of points or LiDAR lines) changes at test time.

Approach

Refines a monocular depth estimate with a propagation mask initialized from sparse depth locations and updated during iterative refinement, so propagation spreads outward from reliable measured pixels; uses masked pixel-to-window attention as a dynamic filter, with the number of iterations set from sparsity.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MSPN instead of NLSPN for ordinary depth completionDepth completion on NYUv2 with 500 sparse depths · NYUv2 (500 sparse depths)RMSE (m): 0.092 -> 0.089Helped
Use MSPN instead of NLSPN for ordinary depth completionDepth completion on NYUv2 with 500 sparse depths · NYUv2 (500 sparse depths)REL: 0.012 -> 0.012No clear effect
Use MSPN instead of Zhang et al.Depth completion on KITTI with 16 LiDAR lines · KITTI validation (16 LiDAR lines)RMSE (mm): 1218.6 -> 1212.7Helped
Use MSPN instead of Zhang et al.Depth completion on KITTI with 16 LiDAR lines · KITTI validation (16 LiDAR lines)MAE (mm): 337.4 -> 341.8Hurt
Use MSPN instead of Zhang et al.Depth completion on KITTI with 64 LiDAR lines · KITTI validation (64 LiDAR lines)RMSE (mm): 848.7 -> 835.7Helped
Use MSPN instead of Zhang et al.Depth completion on KITTI with 64 LiDAR lines · KITTI validation (64 LiDAR lines)MAE (mm): 215.9 -> 218.5Hurt
Use MSPN instead of Zhang et al. for depth hole fillingDepth completion in masked NYUv2 regions · NYUv2 depth hole filling (masked areas)RMSE (m): 0.348 -> 0.325Helped
Add the propagation mask and update process (ablation)MSPN for sparsity-adaptive depth refinement · NYUv2 SDR, especially with few sparse depthsRMSE (m)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NYUv2 KITTI Depth Completion SUN RGB-D

Benchmarks: NYUv2 KITTI Depth Completion validation SUN RGB-D

Metrics: RMSE REL MAE iRMSE iMAE delta threshold accuracy

Baselines: NLSPN DySPN Zhang et al. GuideNet Nconv-CNN PackNet-SAN TWISE S2D

Builds on: spatial propagation network NLSPN DySPN PVT NAF block

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy