atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Segmentation and detection

LiSA: LiDAR Localization with Semantic Awareness

CVPR 2024 · Point clouds › Segmentation and detection · approach: LiDAR segmentation for driving · 14 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Adds semantic awareness to scene coordinate regression LiDAR localization by diffusion-based distillation from a frozen 3D segmentation model, with no inference overhead.

Problem

LiDAR localization with scene coordinate regression treats all points equally, though dynamic objects and repetitive structures hurt localization; segmentation-based filtering adds inference overhead and is sensitive to noisy labels.

Approach

Distill per-point semantic features from a frozen 3D segmentation teacher into an SCR student via a semantic regression branch and diffusion-based distillation loss (DDPM denoising plus L1), then discard teacher and distillation modules at inference.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add semantic awareness through knowledge distillationSGLoc · QEOxfordposition error: 1.53m -> 0.95mHelped
add semantic awareness through knowledge distillationSGLoc · QEOxfordorientation error: 1.60◦ -> 1.14◦Helped
add semantic awareness through knowledge distillationSGLoc · Oxfordposition error: 3.14m -> 2.74mHelped
add semantic awareness through knowledge distillationSGLoc · Oxfordorientation error: 1.88◦ -> 1.32◦Hurt
add semantic awareness through knowledge distillationSGLoc · NCLTposition error: 1.83m -> 1.51mHelped
add semantic awareness through knowledge distillationSGLoc · NCLTorientation error: 3.54◦ -> 2.34◦Helped
remove semantic information (ablation)LiSA on QEOxford · QEOxfordposition error: 0.95m -> 1.79mHurt
replace knowledge distillation with point filtering (ablation)LiSA on QEOxford · QEOxfordposition error: 0.95m -> 1.20mHurt
replace knowledge distillation with point filtering (ablation)LiSA on QEOxford · QEOxfordorientation error: 1.14◦ -> 1.97◦Helped
replace knowledge distillation with feature concatenation (ablation)LiSA on QEOxford · QEOxfordposition error: 0.95m -> 1.14mHurt
replace knowledge distillation with feature concatenation (ablation)LiSA on QEOxford · QEOxfordorientation error: 1.14◦ -> 1.60◦Hurt
use DDPM instead of L1 distillation (ablation)LiSA with SPVNAS features · QEOxfordposition error: 1.28m -> 1.15mHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Oxford Radar RobotCar QEOxford NCLT

Benchmarks: QEOxford Oxford Radar RobotCar NCLT

Metrics: mean position error (m) mean orientation error (deg) inference time (ms)

Baselines: SGLoc PNVLAD DCP PointLoc PosePN++ STCLoc HypLiLoc SGLoc+PGO

Builds on: SGLoc DDPM knowledge distillation SphereFormer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy