atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Weakly supervised detection and segmentation

Learning without Exact Guidance: Updating Large-scale High-resolution Land Cover Maps from Low-resolution Historical Labels

CVPR 2024 · Detection and segmentation › Weakly supervised detection and segmentation · approach: Weakly supervised object localization · 48 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Paraformer, a weakly supervised CNN-Transformer hybrid that updates large-scale 1-m land-cover maps using only low-resolution historical labels (30 m or 10 m), with a pseudo-label-assisted training module that masks inconsistent label pixels.

Problem

Producing up-to-date high-resolution land-cover maps over large areas when only low-resolution historical labels are available, causing spatial mismatch between HR images and LR labels.

Approach

A parallel downsampling-free CNN branch and Transformer branch capture local and global context, and a PLAT module trains on the intersection of the CNN branch's primal prediction and the LR label (mask cross-entropy), so no HR labels or human intervention are needed.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use Paraformer instead of L2HNetlarge-scale HR land-cover mapping · Chesapeake Bay, six-state averagemIoU (%): 63.08 -> 64.65Helped
use Paraformer instead of L2HNetlarge-scale HR land-cover mapping · Poland, FROM GLC10mIoU (%): 6.42%Helped
use Paraformer instead of L2HNetlarge-scale HR land-cover mapping · Poland, ESA GLC10mIoU (%): 3.06%Helped
use Paraformer instead of L2HNetlarge-scale HR land-cover mapping · Poland, Esri GLC10mIoU (%): 4.29%Helped
use Paraformer instead of L2HNetlarge-scale HR land-cover mapping · Poland, GLC FCS30mIoU (%): 5.77%Helped
add the Transformer branch and PLAT to the CNN branch (ablation)Paraformer · Chesapeake Bay, six-state averagemIoU (%): 60.15 -> 64.65Helped
add the CNN branch and PLAT to the Transformer branch (ablation)Paraformer · Chesapeake Bay, six-state averagemIoU (%): 56.49 -> 64.65Helped
add PLAT to the hybrid CNN-Transformer structure (ablation)Paraformer · Chesapeake Bay, six-state averagemIoU (%): 62.81 -> 64.65Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Chesapeake Bay dataset (NAIP 1 m images, NLCD 30 m labels) Poland dataset (LandCover.ai images, FROM GLC10, ESA GLC10, ESRI GLC10, GLC FCS30 labels) OpenEarthMap ground truths

Benchmarks: Chesapeake Bay dataset Poland dataset

Metrics: mIoU

Baselines: L2HNet TransUNet ConViT CoAtNet MobileViT EfficientViT UNetFormer DC-Swin UNet HRNet LinkNet SkipFCN

Builds on: L2HNet TransUNet UNetFormer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy