atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Black-box and transfer attacks

Improving Transferable Targeted Adversarial Attacks with Model Self-Enhancement

CVPR 2024 · Adversarial robustness and security › Black-box and transfer attacks · approach: Transferable adversarial examples · 15 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SASD-WS, a source-model self-enhancement method (sharpness-aware self-distillation plus weight scaling) that flattens the loss landscape of the surrogate to make targeted transfer adversarial attacks more transferable.

Problem

Targeted transferability of adversarial perturbations is low because perturbations overfit mediocre-generalization source models; the paper aims to improve targeted black-box transfer attacks on ImageNet classifiers.

Approach

Fine-tune an auxiliary model with SAM, distill it into the source model while minimizing the distillation loss's sharpness (SASD), then approximate an ensemble of randomly pruned models by scaling the weights by p (WS), and attack with TI-DI-MI using the resulting SASD-WS model.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add weight scaling to SASD (ablation)ResNet-50 targeted transfer attack · NIPS17 targeted attack; target Inc-v3, Dense121, VGG16targeted attack success rate: 46.5 \pm 0.5 -> 70.3 \pm 0.8; 91.2 \pm 0.2 -> 93.0 \pm 0.2; 86.7 \pm 0.1 -> 88.7 \pm 0.4Helped
Add SASD to the normally trained source model (ablation)ResNet-50 targeted transfer attack · NIPS17 targeted attack; target Inc-v3, Dense121, VGG16targeted attack success rate: 7.7 \pm 0.3 -> 46.5 \pm 0.5; 63.7 \pm 0.1 -> 91.2 \pm 0.2; 56.2 \pm 0.5 -> 86.7 \pm 0.1Helped
Fine-tune the auxiliary model before distillation (ablation)SASD · NIPS17 targeted attack; target Inc-v3, Dense121, VGG16targeted attack success rate: 32.2 \pm 0.3 -> 46.5 \pm 0.5; 87.1 \pm 0.0 -> 91.2 \pm 0.2; 81.3 \pm 0.1 -> 86.7 \pm 0.1Helped
Distill the fine-tuned auxiliary model instead of using it directly (ablation)SASD · NIPS17 targeted attack; target Inc-v3, Dense121, VGG16targeted attack success rate: 29.6 \pm 0.5 -> 46.5 \pm 0.5; 87.7 \pm 0.2 -> 91.2 \pm 0.2; 79.5 \pm 0.3 -> 86.7 \pm 0.1Helped
Use SASD rather than commonly used knowledge distillation (ablation)SASD · NIPS17 targeted attack; target Inc-v3, Dense121, VGG16targeted attack success rate: 38.5 \pm 0.4 -> 46.5 \pm 0.5; 90.7 \pm 0.1 -> 91.2 \pm 0.2; 84.9 \pm 0.2 -> 86.7 \pm 0.1Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet (ILSVRC 2012) NIPS17 targeted adversarial attack competition dataset

Benchmarks: NIPS17 targeted adversarial attack competition dataset ImageNet

Metrics: targeted attack success rate white-box attack success rate l2-norm of logit differences

Baselines: Pre-trained RAP GhostNet LGV SSA

Builds on: Sharpness-Aware Minimization knowledge distillation TI-DI-MI LGV RAP GhostNet attack

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy