atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Online and replay-based

Improving Plasticity in Online Continual Learning via Collaborative Learning

CVPR 2024 · Continual learning › Online and replay-based · approach: Plug-and-play online training enhancements · 8 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CCL-DC, a collaborative (two peer learners) plus entropy-regularizing distillation-chain scheme that boosts plasticity and final accuracy when added to six online class-incremental CL methods.

Problem

Online continual learning research focuses on catastrophic forgetting (stability) while neglecting the model's ability to acquire new knowledge (plasticity), which limits final accuracy when data is seen only once.

Approach

Two peer continual learners train simultaneously with mutual KL distillation (CCL), plus a distillation chain over augmentations of increasing difficulty that distills from harder to easier views as a learned entropy regularizer (DC); the scheme is plug-in to existing replay-based online CL methods. A new metric, Relative Forgetting, and an analytic link AA ≳ LA×(1−RF) justify focusing on plastici

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add CCL-DC to OnProOnPro · CIFAR-10, M=500average accuracy: 70.47±2.12 -> 74.49±2.14Helped
Add CCL-DC to ER-ACEER-ACE · CIFAR-100, M=2000average accuracy: 34.21±1.53 -> 45.14±1.00Helped
Add CCL-DC to OCMOCM · Tiny-ImageNet, M=2000average accuracy: 18.36±0.95 -> 23.36±1.18Helped
Add CCL-DC to OnProOnPro · ImageNet-100, M=5000average accuracy: 38.75±1.03 -> 47.93±1.26Helped
Add multiview classification training without CCL-DC (ablation)ER · CIFAR-100, M=2000average accuracy: 31.89±1.45 -> 38.18±1.46Helped
Add CCL without multiview learning or DC (ablation)ER · CIFAR-100, M=2000average accuracy: 31.89±1.45 -> 41.05±1.21Helped
Add CCL-DC (ablation)ER · CIFAR-100, M=2000average accuracy: 31.89±1.45 -> 44.45±1.04Helped
Add multiview classification training without CCL-DC (ablation)ER-ACE · CIFAR-100, M=2000average accuracy: 34.21±1.53 -> 38.61±1.48Helped
Add CCL without multiview learning or DC (ablation)ER-ACE · CIFAR-100, M=2000average accuracy: 34.21±1.53 -> 40.90±1.08Helped
Reverse DC distillation direction to easy-to-hard (ablation)ER + CCL-DC · CIFAR-100, M=2000average accuracy: 44.45±1.04 -> 40.95±0.97Hurt
Use same-difficulty DC distillation (ablation)ER + CCL-DC · CIFAR-100, M=2000average accuracy: 44.45±1.04 -> 43.64±1.09Hurt
Apply easy-to-hard self-distillation chain within one model (ablation)ER · CIFAR-100, M=2000average accuracy: 31.89±1.45 -> 35.00±1.31Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 Tiny-ImageNet ImageNet-100

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 Tiny-ImageNet ImageNet-100

Metrics: average accuracy learning accuracy (plasticity) relative forgetting (stability)

Baselines: ER DER++ ER-ACE OCM GSA OnPro

Builds on: Codistillation Deep Mutual Learning Experience Replay DER++ OnPro

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy