atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Flexible Biometrics Recognition: Bridging the Multimodality Gap through Attention Alignment and Prompt Tuning

CVPR 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Multi-modal object re-identification · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Flexible Biometric Recognition (FBR) using a Multimodal Fusion Attention ViT (MFA-ViT) with Multimodal Prompt Tuning (MPT) to fuse face, periocular and soft-biometric attributes for intra- and cross-modality face-periocular recognition.

Problem

Face and periocular recognition each suffer under occlusion, and existing multimodal or cross-modality methods trade off intra-modality against cross-modality matching while requiring all modalities at deployment.

Approach

A shared-parameter ViT with depth-wise convolutional multimodal fusion attention layers and a multimodal prompt tuning mechanism that jointly embeds face, periocular and soft-biometric tokens, producing a modality-invariant embedding usable from either face or periocular input alone.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MFA-ViT/MPT instead of ViT/VPT with soft-biometric attributesFBR · Ethnic, FaceScrub, IMDB, and Cross-Modal DB; intra- and cross-modality recognitionrank-1 accuracy: 92.95 -> 94.82; 85.68 -> 89.98; 83.37 -> 86.70; 86.10 -> 89.07Helped
Remove the soft-biometric attributes (ablation)MFA-ViT · Ethnic, FaceScrub, IMDB, and Cross-Modal DB; intra- and cross-modality recognitionrank-1 accuracyHurt
Add multimodal-prompt tuning (MPT) (ablation)MFA-ViT · Ethnic, FaceScrub, IMDB, and Cross-Modal DB; intra- and cross-modality recognitionrank-1 accuracyHelped
Replace MPT with visual prompt tuning (VPT) (ablation)MFA-ViT · Ethnic, FaceScrub, IMDB, and Cross-Modal DB; intra- and cross-modality recognitionrank-1 accuracyHurt
Use joint prompt embeddings (PRM) rather than the class token (CLS) as the classification-head input (ablation)MFA-ViT/MPT · Ethnic, FaceScrub, IMDB, and Cross-Modal DB; intra- and cross-modality recognitionrank-1 accuracy: 94.57 -> 94.82; 89.18 -> 89.98; 86.24 -> 86.70; 88.34 -> 89.07Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: VGGFace2 MAAD-Face Ethnic FaceScrub IMDB Cross-Modal DB

Benchmarks: Ethnic FaceScrub IMDB Cross-Modal DB

Metrics: rank-1 recognition accuracy

Baselines: Baseline (unimodal face/periocular) Tiong et al. [32] George et al. [5] Ng et al. [22] ViT/VPT HA-ViT

Builds on: Visual Prompt Tuning HA-ViT Large-margin softmax loss Feature tokenizer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy