atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph algorithms and clustering

Fine-Grained Bipartite Concept Factorization for Clustering

CVPR 2024 · Graph learning › Graph algorithms and clustering · approach: Neural and local graph clustering · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Figer-CF, a concept factorization method that fuses cross-order random-walk neighbor graphs and enforces bipartite graph partitioning structure for clustering, with convergence guarantees and experiments on four image datasets.

Problem

Concept factorization for clustering uses only first-order neighbor information and does not explicitly enforce cluster structure in the factor matrices.

Approach

Fuses multi-order (up to A=3) symmetric random-walk probability matrices into a PSD neighbor graph, and learns score and coefficient factors jointly with a bipartite graph Laplacian constraint so that the coefficient matrix has explicit group structure.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · Jaffe 10 Classes (Overall)ACC: 0.953 -> 0.977Helped
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · PIX 10 Classes (Overall)ACC: 0.920 -> 0.940Helped
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · Semeion 10 Classes (Overall)ACC: 0.654 -> 0.635Hurt
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · COIL20 20 Classes (Overall)ACC: 0.690 -> 0.652Hurt
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · Jaffe 10 Classes (Overall)NMI: 0.896 -> 0.970Helped
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · PIX 10 Classes (Overall)NMI: 0.892 -> 0.950Helped
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · Semeion 10 Classes (Overall)NMI: 0.553 -> 0.626Helped
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · COIL20 20 Classes (Overall)NMI: 0.762 -> 0.760Hurt
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · Jaffe 10 Classes (Overall)PUR: 0.953 -> 0.977Helped
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · PIX 10 Classes (Overall)PUR: 0.920 -> 0.940Helped
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · Semeion 10 Classes (Overall)PUR: 0.655 -> 0.682Helped
Use Figer-CF instead of the strongest listed baselineClustering methods · COIL20 20 Classes (Overall)PUR: 0.690 -> 0.665Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Jaffe PIX Semeion COIL20

Benchmarks: Jaffe PIX Semeion COIL20

Metrics: ACC NMI PUR

Baselines: WNMF ONMF CNMF KNMF RMNMF OPMC MKKM-SR EWNMF GLS-MKNMF

Builds on: Convex-NMF / concept factorization spectral clustering-based subspace clustering Ky-Fan theorem

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy