Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning
Equivariant Multi-Modality Image Fusion
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes EMMA, a self-supervised multi-modality image fusion paradigm that learns frozen pseudo-sensing networks and trains a U-Net-like fuser with an equivariant imaging loss under shifts, rotations and reflections.
Problem
Multi-modality image fusion (infrared-visible and medical) lacks ground-truth fused images, so supervised training is infeasible and hand-crafted fusion losses and priors are domain-dependent.
Approach
Learn frozen pseudo-sensing U-Nets that map a fused image back to each source modality, and enforce equivariance of the fuser-sensor composition under geometric transforms (equivariant imaging prior), so the fuser is trained without fusion ground truth.
Key results
- On MSRS IVF, EMMA reaches EN 6.71, SD 44.13, SF 11.56, VIF 0.97, among the best on most metrics versus 9 SOTA methods.
- On M3FD detection with YOLOv5, EMMA achieves 82.9 mAP@0.5, above the best baseline Meta/CDDFuse at 81.5/81.6.
- On MSRS segmentation with DeepLabV3+, EMMA achieves 63.7 mIoU, the highest among compared fusion methods (SegMIF 63.2).
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use EMMA instead of the strongest listed baseline, CDDF | Infrared-visible fusion · MSRS | VIF: 1.05 -> 0.97 | Hurt |
| Use EMMA instead of the strongest listed baseline, CDDF | Infrared-visible fusion · RoadScene | SD: 54.42 -> 54.81 | Helped |
| Use EMMA instead of the strongest listed baseline, CDDF | Infrared-visible fusion · M3FD | EN: 7.04 -> 7.12 | Helped |
| Use EMMA instead of the strongest listed baseline, CDDF | Medical image fusion · Harvard | SD: 68.46 -> 69.42 | Helped |
| Add equivariant loss (ablation) | EMMA · MSRS test set | EN: 6.36 -> 6.71 | Helped |
| Add sensing loss (ablation) | EMMA · MSRS test set | EN: 6.42 -> 6.71 | Helped |
| Replace sensing and equivariant losses with ℓ1(f, i) + ℓ1(f, v) (ablation) | EMMA · MSRS test set | EN: 6.71 -> 6.21 | Hurt |
| Add input augmentations to the traditional ℓ1 fusion loss (ablation) | Traditional fusion-loss variant · MSRS test set | EN: 6.21 -> 6.26 | Helped |
| Add global extractor (ablation) | EMMA U-Fuser · MSRS test set | EN: 6.45 -> 6.71 | Helped |
| Add local extractor (ablation) | EMMA U-Fuser · MSRS test set | EN: 6.52 -> 6.71 | Helped |
Surprising findings
- Simply applying the same geometric transformations as data augmentation with the traditional fusion loss yields only slight improvement, suggesting the equivariant loss rather than augmentation drives gains.
Limitations
- Pseudo-sensing modules depend on fused outputs of 15 existing SOTA methods as pseudo ground truth, so quality is bounded by them.
- Results on Harvard medical fusion are mixed on some metrics (e.g., SCD and VIF not uniformly best).
Experimental setup
Datasets: MSRS RoadScene M3FD Harvard Medical dataset
Benchmarks: MSRS RoadScene M3FD Harvard Medical dataset
Metrics: EN SD SF AG SCD VIF mAP@0.5 IoU
Baselines: SDNet TarDAL DeFusion MetaFusion CDDFuse LRRNet MURF DDFM SegMIF
Builds on: equivariant imaging Restormer U-Net DeepLabV3+ YOLOv5
Closest papers by meaning
- Equivariant Self-Supervised Learning: Encouraging Equivariance in Representations (ICLR 2022 · similarity 0.85)
- Self-supervised Transformation Learning for Equivariant Representations (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.84)
- Multi-modal Vision Pre-training for Medical Image Analysis (CVPR 2025 · similarity 0.83)
- Modalities Contribute Unequally: Enhancing Medical Multi-modal Learning through Adaptive Modality Token Re-balancing (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.83)
- Beyond Spatial-Domain Supervision: A Relation Constrained Space for Multi-Modal Image Fusion (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.83)
- When Integral Meets Decomposition: A Signal-Level Self-Supervised Feature Decompose Paradigm for Multi-Modal Image Fusion (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.82)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
