atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Visual question answering

EgoThink: Evaluating First-Person Perspective Thinking Capability of Vision-Language Models

CVPR 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Visual question answering · approach: Visual reasoning diagnostics · 26 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces EgoThink, a 700-image, open-ended VQA benchmark from Ego4D frames testing first-person thinking across six capabilities and twelve dimensions, scoring 21-ish VLMs with GPT-4 as judge.

Problem

Existing VLM evaluation benchmarks focus mainly on third-person perspective, and first-person (egocentric) thinking capabilities needed for embodied agents and robotics remain largely unexplored.

Approach

A manually annotated egocentric VQA benchmark organized into six core capabilities (object, activity, localization, reasoning, forecasting, planning) with twelve fine-grained dimensions, evaluated with open-ended answers graded by GPT-4 single-answer grading (0/0.5/1) and validated against humans and other LLM judges.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Increase the LLM parameter scale from ∼7B to ∼13B in LLaVALLaVA · EgoThinkAverage scoreHelped
Increase the LLM parameter scale from ∼7B to ∼13B in LLaVA-1.5LLaVA-1.5 · EgoThinkAverage scoreHelped
Increase LLM scale from ∼7B to ∼13B in PandaGPT and InstructBLIPPandaGPT and InstructBLIP · EgoThinkAverage scoreNo clear effect
Apply instruction tuning and additional instruction-aware tokens (ablation)BLIP-2-11B · EgoThinkAverage score: 49.6 -> 51.5Helped
Add segmentation marks as visual grounding informationGPT-4V · EgoThinkObject localization correctnessHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Ego4D

Benchmarks: EgoThink

Metrics: single-answer grading score (0/0.5/1) Pearson correlation with human judgments Cohen's kappa

Baselines: GPT-4V OpenFlamingo-7B BLIP-2-6.7B VideoChat-7B LLaVA-1.5-7B MiniGPT-4-7B InstructBLIP-7B LLaVA-13B-Llama2

Builds on: Ego4D Set-of-Mark

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy