atlas

Research map / Video / Video generation

DiffSal: Joint Audio and Video Learning for Diffusion Saliency Prediction

CVPR 2024 · Video › Video generation · approach: Diffusion-based video editing · 17 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DiffSal, a conditional diffusion model that predicts audio-visual saliency maps by denoising saliency maps conditioned on video and audio features via a Saliency-UNet with multi-modal attention modulation, trained with a simple MSE loss.

Problem

Audio-visual saliency prediction is limited by customized architectures and task-specific losses, and it is unclear how to design a diffusion model that captures effective audio-visual interaction and a generalized saliency network.

Approach

Formulates saliency prediction as conditional generation of the saliency map from noise, conditioned on spatio-temporal video and audio features, with a Saliency-UNet that uses efficient spatio-temporal cross-attention and a multi-modal interaction module, optimized with plain MSE and iteratively refined at inference.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use DiffSal instead of CASP-NetAVSP models · DIEMCC: 0.655 -> 0.660Helped
Use DiffSal instead of CASP-NetAVSP models · Coutrot1CC: 0.561 -> 0.638Helped
Use DiffSal instead of CASP-NetAVSP models · Coutrot2CC: 0.788 -> 0.835Helped
Use DiffSal instead of CASP-NetAVSP models · AVADCC: 0.691 -> 0.738Helped
Use DiffSal instead of CASP-NetAVSP models · ETMDCC: 0.620 -> 0.652Helped
Use DiffSal instead of CASP-NetAVSP models · SumMeCC: 0.499 -> 0.572Helped
Add ECA and MIM to the baseline (ablation)DiffSal · AVADCC: 0.701 -> 0.738Helped
Add ECA and MIM to the baseline (ablation)DiffSal · ETMDCC: 0.632 -> 0.652Helped
Use audio-only inputs instead of audio-visual inputs (ablation)DiffSal · AVADCC: 0.738 -> 0.343Hurt
Use video-only inputs instead of audio-visual inputs (ablation)DiffSal · AVADCC: 0.738 -> 0.716Hurt
Replace MIM with bilinear interaction (ablation)DiffSal · AVADCC: 0.738 -> 0.716Hurt
Replace MIM with addition (ablation)DiffSal · AVADCC: 0.738 -> 0.706Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: AVAD Coutrot1 Coutrot2 DIEM ETMD SumMe DHF1k Kinetics AudioSet

Benchmarks: AVAD Coutrot1 Coutrot2 DIEM ETMD SumMe

Metrics: CC NSS AUC-J SIM

Baselines: ACLNet TASED-Net STAViS ViNet TSFP-Net CASP-Net

Builds on: DDPM DDIM DiffusionDet MViTv2 VGGish

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy