atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Point cloud classification

DeCoTR: Enhancing Depth Completion with 2D and 3D Attentions

CVPR 2024 · Point clouds › Point cloud classification · approach: Point-language and open-vocabulary 3D · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DeCoTR, which upgrades the S2D depth completion baseline with 2D self-attention and then uplifts features to a normalized 3D point cloud processed by point transformer layers with global attention, achieving SOTA on NYUv2 without iterative spatial propagation.

Problem

Image-guided depth completion from sparse depth and RGB, where prior methods rely on 2D feature processing or iterative spatial propagation and 3D methods suffer from extremely sparse input points.

Approach

Enhance a convolutional baseline (S2D) with efficient 2D self-attention in bottleneck and skip connections to get accurate initial depths, then un-project the guidance features into a dense 3D point cloud, normalize it to a unit ball, and apply neighborhood vector attention plus downsampled global attention in 3D.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add efficient 2D attention to S2D features (ablation)S2D · NYUD-v2RMSE: 0.204 -> 0.094Helped
add 3D-TR to the S2D baseline (ablation)S2D · NYUD-v2RMSE: 0.204 -> 0.091Helped
add neighborhood-based 3D cross-attention after S2D-TR (ablation)S2D-TR · NYUD-v2RMSE: 0.094 -> 0.091Helped
normalize the uplifted point cloud (ablation)DeCoTR · NYUD-v2RMSE: 0.089 -> 0.087Helped
add efficient global attention on downsampled 3D points (ablation)DeCoTR · NYUD-v2RMSE: 0.087 -> 0.086Helped
replace positional-embedding multiplier with conventional relative-position embedding3D-TR · Depth completiondepth completion accuracyNo clear effect
use DeCoTR instead of CompletionFormerNYUD-v2-trained depth completion models · ScanNet-v2 zero-shotRMSE: 0.194 -> 0.188Helped
use DeCoTR instead of NLSPNKITTI-trained depth completion models · DDAD zero-shotRMSE: 701.9 -> 399.2Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NYU Depth V2 KITTI Depth Completion ScanNet-v2 DDAD

Benchmarks: NYU Depth V2 KITTI Depth Completion ScanNet-v2 DDAD

Metrics: RMSE Abs Rel delta < 1.25 MAE iRMSE iMAE

Baselines: S2D DeepLiDAR CSPN DepthNormal ACMNet GuideNet TWISE NLSPN RigNet DySPN CompletionFormer PRNet

Builds on: S2D Point Transformer CompletionFormer NLSPN GraphCSPN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy