atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

DS-NeRV: Implicit Neural Video Representation with Decomposed Static and Dynamic Codes

CVPR 2024 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Spike and neuromorphic deblurring · 23 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DS-NeRV, an implicit neural video representation that decomposes a video into sparse learnable static codes (weighted-sum sampled) and dynamic codes (interpolation sampled), fused by a cross-channel attention module.

Problem

Single-network implicit neural video representations (NeRV-style) entangle static and dynamic content, so they cannot efficiently compress redundant static information or model globally coherent dynamic details.

Approach

Decompose video into sparse learnable static codes sampled by distance-weighted sum of two neighboring codes, and dynamic codes obtained by interpolating a denser code set over time, without optical flow or residual supervision; fuse them with a cross-channel attention module before NeRV-style decoding.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
decompose videos into learned static and dynamic codesDS-NeRV · Big Buck Bunny, 0.35M parametersPSNR: 29.78 -> 31.20Helped
decompose videos into learned static and dynamic codesDS-NeRV · UVG 960×1920, averagePSNR: 32.82 -> 33.31Helped
decompose videos into learned static and dynamic codesDS-NeRV · DAVIS, averagePSNR: 28.91 -> 30.36Helped
decompose videos into learned static and dynamic codesDS-NeRV · DAVIS inpainting, central mask, averagePSNR: 23.03 -> 25.06Helped
increase dynamic-code length (ablation)DS-NeRV · JockeyPSNR: For static length 30: 28.68 -> 30.87 -> 32.16 -> 32.56Helped
increase dynamic-code length (ablation)DS-NeRV · HoneyPSNR: For static length 30: 39.13 -> 39.53 -> 39.52 -> 39.43No clear effect
vary static-code length while dynamic-code length is 0 (ablation)DS-NeRV · JockeyPSNR: 29.91 -> 28.68 -> 29.91 -> 30.88Mixed
vary static-code length while dynamic-code length is 0 (ablation)DS-NeRV · HoneyPSNR: 38.80 -> 39.13 -> 39.23 -> 39.38Helped
use both static and dynamic codes instead of setting one code length to 0 (ablation)DS-NeRV · Jockey and HoneyPSNRHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Big Buck Bunny UVG DAVIS

Benchmarks: Big Buck Bunny UVG DAVIS

Metrics: PSNR MS-SSIM bpp

Baselines: NeRV DNeRV HNeRV H.264 HEVC

Builds on: NeRV HNeRV DNeRV GLO E-NeRV

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy