atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Clustering for Protein Representation Learning

CVPR 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Protein representation learning · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a neural clustering framework that iteratively groups amino acids into spherical clusters, aggregates them into medoids, and nominates top-scoring clusters to learn hierarchical protein representations for classification.

Problem

Protein representation learning treats all amino acids equally, ignoring that only a few critical residues determine a protein's structure and function.

Approach

Iteratively apply spherical cluster initialization around each amino acid, attention-based cluster representation extraction, and GCN-based cluster nomination over 1D sequence and 3D structure, so the network progressively keeps only the most representative amino acids for prediction.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace neural clustering with GRACLUS (ablation)Neural clustering framework · EC number predictionFmax: 0.866 -> 0.792Hurt
replace cluster representation extraction with average pooling (ablation)Neural clustering framework · EC number predictionFmax: 0.866 -> 0.817Hurt
replace learned attention scores with random scores (ablation)Neural clustering framework · EC number predictionFmax: 0.866 -> 0.765Hurt
reduce clustering iterations from 4 to 1 (ablation)Neural clustering framework · Enzyme reaction classificationaccuracy: 89.6 -> 84.7Hurt
reduce clustering iterations from 4 to 2 (ablation)Neural clustering framework · Enzyme reaction classificationaccuracy: 89.6 -> 88.1Hurt
reduce clustering iterations from 4 to 3 (ablation)Neural clustering framework · Enzyme reaction classificationaccuracy: 89.6 -> 89.0Hurt
increase clustering iterations from 4 to 5 (ablation)Neural clustering framework · Enzyme reaction classificationaccuracy: 89.6 -> 86.3Hurt
randomly remove 10% of structure coordinates (ablation)Neural clustering framework · Protein fold classification (Superfamily)accuracy: 81.2 -> 78.7Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: EC number prediction dataset (Gligorijevic et al.) GO term prediction dataset protein fold classification dataset (Hou et al.) enzyme reaction dataset (Gligorijevic/IEConv processed)

Benchmarks: EC number prediction GO term prediction protein fold classification enzyme reaction classification

Metrics: Fmax accuracy

Baselines: CDConv GearNet ProNet New IEConv GVP GCN GAT LM-GVP ESM-1b

Builds on: CDConv GearNet ProNet GraphQA

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy