atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

C3: High-Performance and Low-Complexity Neural Compression from a Single Image or Video

CVPR 2024 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Learned video compression · 50 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces C3, an overfitted neural field codec (improving Cool-chic with soft-rounding, Kumaraswamy noise, and architecture changes, extended to video) that matches VTM on CLIC2020 images and VCT on UVG video at very low decoding MACs/pixel.

Problem

Neural codecs trained for generalization have high decoding complexity, while existing single-instance overfitted codecs (COIN, Cool-chic) have low complexity but poor rate-distortion performance, and no overfitted approach had been applied to video at competitive RD.

Approach

Overfit a small synthesis network and autoregressive entropy model per image or video, using improved quantization-aware optimization (soft-rounding with annealing, Kumaraswamy noise, smaller quantization step, soft-rounding gradients) and architecture changes (GELU, shifted log-scale, conditional entropy model), plus 3D latents, video patching, wide context with custom masking for video.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Improve Cool-chic v2 with C3's optimization and architecture changesCool-chic v2 · CLIC2020 professional validationBD-rate: −20.8%Helped
Adapt the model per imageC3 · CLIC2020 professional validationBD-rate vs VTM: −0.1% -> −2.9%Helped
Add quantization step < 1 (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3 Adaptive: 2.6%Helped
Add adaptive learning rate in stage 2 (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3 Adaptive: 3.4%Helped
Add shifted log-scale (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3 Adaptive: 4.2%Helped
Use GELU activations (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3 Adaptive: 12.6%Helped
Add Kumaraswamy noise (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3 Adaptive: 23.6%Helped
Add soft-rounding (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3 Adaptive: 39.8%Helped
Add soft-rounding (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3: 22.18%Helped
Add Kumaraswamy noise (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3: 3.90%Helped
Use GELU activations (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3: 3.27%Helped
Add shifted log-scale (ablation)C3 · KodakBD-rate vs C3: 0.87%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Kodak CLIC2020 UVG-1k

Benchmarks: Kodak CLIC2020 UVG-1k

Metrics: BD-rate PSNR decoding complexity (MACs/pixel) encoding and decoding time

Baselines: BPG VTM BMS CST EVC MLIC+ Cool-chic v2 HEVC HiNeRV FFNeRV VCT DCVC

Builds on: Cool-chic COIN NeRV BD-rate

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy