atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Attribute-Guided Pedestrian Retrieval: Bridging Person Re-ID with Internal Attribute Variability

CVPR 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Supervised person re-identification · 24 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces the Attribute-Guided Pedestrian Retrieval (AGPR) task and the ATPR transformer, which fuses global ID learning with attribute-grouped local branches and correlation/decorrelation regularization, evaluated on a new RAP-based benchmark.

Problem

Standard person re-identification ignores intra-ID attribute variations (e.g., changed clothing or accessories), so retrieval cannot be refined by user-specified attributes while keeping identity matching.

Approach

Combines a ViT-based global ID branch with a local attribute branch where tokens are grouped by attribute groups via OpenPose keypoints and attribute embeddings, plus inter-group correlation and intra-group decorrelation regularizers, so queries can be retrieved with specified attributes while preserving identity.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ATPR rather than TransReID+CE+JPMRAP person retrieval · RAP, no cross att.mAP: 71.39 -> 74.26Helped
Use ATPR rather than TransReID+CE+JPMRAP person retrieval · RAP, no cross att.rank-1: 83.77 -> 86.93Helped
Use ATPR rather than TransReIDRAP retrieval with specified attributes · RAP, cross-att.:90%mAP: 38.91 -> 49.51Helped
Use ATPR rather than TransReIDRAP retrieval with specified attributes · RAP, cross-att.:90%rank-1: 42.76 -> 60.33Helped
Remove the global loss, leaving only local loss (ablation)ATPR · RAP, no cross att.mAP: 74.26 -> 69.98Hurt
Remove the local loss, leaving only global loss (ablation)ATPR · RAP, no cross att.mAP: 74.26 -> 70.47Hurt
Remove attribute regularization (ablation)ATPR · RAP, cross-att.:90%mAP: 49.51 -> 46.66Hurt
Use IGAC without IGAD (ablation)ATPR · RAP, cross-att.:90%mAP: 49.51 -> 48.41Hurt
Use IGAD without IGAC (ablation)ATPR · RAP, cross-att.:90%mAP: 49.51 -> 48.67Hurt
Use fixed patch-attribute associations (ablation)ATPR · RAP, cross-att.:90%mAP: 49.51 -> 48.46Hurt
Remove attribute embeddings (ablation)ATPR · RAP, cross-att.:90%mAP: 49.51 -> 43.87Hurt
Remove the [class] token from AEG (ablation)ATPR · RAP, cross-att.:90%mAP: 49.51 -> 45.22Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: RAP

Benchmarks: RAP AGPR benchmark

Metrics: mAP rank-1

Baselines: HACNN PAR ReIDCaps CAL TransReID IDE-ATT-R MSCAN

Builds on: TransReID ViT CAL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy