Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking
Learning Adaptive Warping for Real-World Rolling Shutter Correction
Check your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Train and evaluate the proposed method on real-world BS-RSC data rather than relying on synthesized-data baselines | Rolling shutter correction · BS-RSC test | PSNR (dB): 19.80 -> 28.23; 23.60 -> 28.23; 24.86 -> 28.23 | Helped |
| Train and evaluate the proposed method on real-world BS-RSC data rather than relying on synthesized-data baselines | Rolling shutter correction · BS-RSC test | SSIM: 0.698 -> 0.882; 0.808 -> 0.882; 0.820 -> 0.882 | Helped |
| Use the proposed adaptive-warping model | Rolling shutter correction · Fastec-RS test and validation | PSNR (dB): 28.34 -> 28.56 | Helped |
| Use the proposed adaptive-warping model | Rolling shutter correction · Fastec-RS test and validation | SSIM: 0.840 -> 0.855 | Helped |
| Add a second input frame rather than using a single frame (ablation) | Ours · Fastec-RS test and validation | PSNR (dB): 23.84 -> 27.20 | Helped |
| Add a third input frame rather than using two frames (ablation) | Ours · Fastec-RS test and validation | PSNR (dB): 27.20 -> 28.56 | Helped |
| Add a third input frame rather than using two frames (ablation) | Ours · Fastec-RS test and validation | SSIM: 0.838 -> 0.855 | Helped |
| Add adaptive warping instead of convolution-only fusion (ablation) | Ours · Fastec-RS test and validation | PSNR (dB): 26.14 -> 28.56 | Helped |
| Add adaptive warping instead of common backward warping (ablation) | Ours · Fastec-RS test and validation | PSNR (dB): 26.76 -> 28.56 | Helped |
| Add adaptive warping instead of DFW (ablation) | Ours · Fastec-RS test and validation | PSNR (dB): 27.20 -> 28.56 | Helped |
| Use 9 rather than 2 displacement fields (ablation) | Ours · Fastec-RS test and validation | PSNR (dB): 27.41 -> 28.56 | Helped |
| Use 16 rather than 9 displacement fields (ablation) | Ours · Fastec-RS test and validation | PSNR (dB): 28.56 -> 27.98 | Hurt |
Closest papers by meaning
- Rolling Shutter Correction with Intermediate Distortion Flow Estimation (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.91)
- Single Image Rolling Shutter Removal with Diffusion Models (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- USB-NeRF: Unrolling Shutter Bundle Adjusted Neural Radiance Fields (ICLR 2024 · similarity 0.86)
- EVS-assisted Joint Deblurring Rolling-Shutter Correction and Video Frame Interpolation through Sensor Inverse Modeling (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.83)
- Order-One Rolling Shutter Cameras (CVPR 2025 · similarity 0.82)
- Motion Blur Decomposition with Cross-shutter Guidance (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.81)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.