atlas

Research map / Image generation / GANs

LARGE: Latent-Based Regression Through GAN Semantics

CVPR 2022 · Image generation › GANs · approach: Large-scale GAN latent analysis · 17 citations (OpenAlex)

Check your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use GAN latent semantic distances as the regression feature instead of generating labeled training images (ablation)LARGE head-pose estimation · CelebA-HQ test setMAE: 3.23 ± 3.67 -> 2.97 ± 2.76Helped
Use e4e inversion rather than pSp-based inversion (ablation)LARGE · CelebA-HQ pose and age estimationMAEHelped
Use semantic-preserving e4e inversion rather than reconstruction-focused pSp inversion (ablation)LARGE · CelebA-HQ pose and age estimationMAEHelped
Replace the unsupervised per-layer weighted distance with Euclidean distance (ablation)LARGE W+ to W boundary mapping · Pose and age regressionMAEHurt
Replace the unsupervised per-layer weighted distance with a single layer distance (ablation)LARGE W+ to W boundary mapping · Pose and age regressionMAEHurt
Use all 18 per-layer distances as regression features instead of the weighted distance (ablation)LARGE W+ to W boundary mapping · Pose and age regressionMAEMixed
Use polynomial regression of degrees 2, 3, or 5 instead of linear calibration (ablation)LARGE · CelebA-HQ pose and CACD age estimationMAEHurt
Change linear-regression regularization among none, L1, L2, and ElasticNet (ablation)LARGE calibration · Few-shot regressionMAENo clear effect
Use GAN-latent sorting scores instead of CLIP embedding distancesLARGE text-guided face sorting · Hair color, makeup, expression, and hair lengthpreferred responses: 73.55% vs 25.81%; 70.53% vs 18.25%; 53.45% vs 43.27%; 84.73% vs 2.18%Helped
Use GAN-latent sorting scores instead of SSV pose predictionsLARGE cat sorting · Cat yaw and pitchpreferred responses: 66.67% vs 28.99%; 82.50% vs 7.50%Helped
Use StyleGAN latent distances rather than alternative feature-space SVM distancesLARGE · CelebA-HQ pose and age regressionMAEHelped
Use a text-derived StyleCLIP semantic boundary for age regressionLARGE · CACD age estimationMAE (years): 7.46 vs 7.59Helped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy