atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

Universal Adversarial Perturbations

CVPR 2017 · Adversarial robustness and security › Attacks on text and graphs · approach: Defenses against universal perturbations · 2,731 citations (OpenAlex)

Check your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add a universal perturbation with ℓ∞ norm bound ξ=10ImageNet classifiers · ILSVRC 2012 validationfooling rate: 78.3% to 93.7%Helped
Use a universal perturbation instead of a random vector with ℓ2 norm 2000CaffeNet · ILSVRC 2012 validationfooling rate: 10% to 85%Helped
Compute the universal perturbation on VGG-19 and transfer it to other architecturesImageNet classifiers · ILSVRC 2012 validationfooling rate: 64.0%, 57.2%, 53.6%, 73.5%, 77.8%, 58.0%Helped
Compute the universal perturbation using only 500 training imagesGoogLeNet · ILSVRC 2012 validationfooling rate: more than 30%Helped
Fine-tune using a mixture of universally perturbed and clean training imagesVGG-F · ILSVRC 2012 validationfooling rate: 93.7% to 76.2%Helped
Repeat the universal-perturbation fine-tuning procedureVGG-F · ILSVRC 2012 validationfooling rate: 76.2% to 80.0%Hurt
Choose a random norm-2000 direction from the subspace spanned by the first 100 singular vectorsCaffeNet · A held-out image setfooling rate: 10% to nearly 38%Helped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy