Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses
Ranking Sets of Defeasible Elements in Preferential Approaches to Structured Argumentation: Postulates, Relations, and Characterizations
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Closest papers by meaning
- A Comparative Study of Ranking-Based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation (AAAI 2016 · similarity 0.90)
- An Extension-Based Argument-Ranking Semantics: Social Rankings in Abstract Argumentation (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- Redefining ABA+ Semantics via Abstract Set-to-Set Attacks (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.87)
- Bilateral Gradual Semantics for Weighted Argumentation (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.87)
- Dung’s Argumentation Framework: Unveiling the Expressive Power with Inconsistent Databases (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.86)
- Defeasible Normative Reasoning: A Proof-Theoretic Integration of Logical Argumentation (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.85)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.