atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Preferred Explanations for Ontology-Mediated Queries under Existential Rules

AAAI 2021 · Learning theory and algorithms › Prediction and decision losses · approach: Counterfactual explanations and recourse · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use cardinality-minimal explanations instead of inclusion-minimal explanationsExplanation problems for OMQA under existential rules · GF existential rules, data complexityIS-MINEX complexityHurt
Use weight-minimal explanations instead of cardinality-minimal explanationsMINEX-REL, MINEX-IRREL, and MINEX-NEC · Existential-rule languages studiedcomputational complexityHurt
Use cardinality-minimal explanations instead of weight-minimal explanationsIS-MINEX and ALL-MINEX · Existential-rule languages studiedcomputational complexityNo clear effect
Add fact weights to express differing penaltiesPreferred explanations for OMQA · Weight-minimal explanationsroute preference: 14Helped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy