atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / CNN features

Predicting When Saliency Maps Are Accurate and Eye Fixations Consistent

CVPR 2016 · Detection and segmentation › CNN features · approach: RGB salient object detection · 17 citations (OpenAlex)

Check your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use image features from an ImageNet-trained AlexNet to predict saliency-map accuracySaliency-map algorithms on MIT and PASCAL · MIT and PASCALSpearman correlation with true saliency accuracy: 0.52 on MIT; 0.80 on PASCALHelped
Use predicted per-image accuracy to select the saliency algorithmSaliency algorithm selection · MITsaliency prediction performance: about 1%Helped
Predict fixation consistency from image features based on object recognitionEye-fixation consistency prediction · MITSpearman correlation with true consistencyHelped
Use saliency-map accuracy as a proxy for fixation consistencySaliency models · MITSpearman correlation with fixation consistency: around 0.2 − 0.3; around 0.82Mixed
Use fixation-map entropy as a measure of fixation consistencyEye-fixation consistency measurement · MITcorrelation with consistency measure: about 0.85Mixed
Use saliency-map entropy to infer fixation consistencySaliency models · MITcorrelation with fixation consistency: ≤0.25No clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy