atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / CNN features

Learning Activity Progression in LSTMs for Activity Detection and Early Detection

CVPR 2016 · Detection and segmentation › CNN features · approach: Efficient DETR query design · 410 citations (OpenAlex)

Check your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add ranking loss on detection score (ablation)LSTM · ActivityNet activity detection, α = 0.5mAP: 31.3% -> 36.4%Helped
Add ranking loss on discriminative margin (ablation)LSTM · ActivityNet activity detection, α = 0.5mAP: 31.3% -> 35.1%Helped
Add ranking loss on detection score (ablation)LSTM · ActivityNet activity detection, α = 0.8mAP: 24.6% -> 28.7%Helped
Add ranking loss on discriminative margin (ablation)LSTM · ActivityNet activity detection, α = 0.8mAP: 24.6% -> 27.2%Helped
Add ranking loss on detection score (ablation)LSTM · ActivityNet early detection, first 3/10 observed, α = 0.5mAP: 29.6% -> 34.1%Helped
Add ranking loss on discriminative margin (ablation)LSTM · ActivityNet early detection, first 3/10 observed, α = 0.5mAP: 29.6% -> 31.4%Helped
Combine both ranking losses (ablation)LSTM · ActivityNetmAPNo clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy