atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

When Hypergraph Meets Heterophily: New Benchmark Datasets and Baseline

AAAI 2025 · Graph learning › GNN architectures · approach: Graph structure learning · 34 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces hypergraph homophily measures, four new heterophilic hypergraph benchmarks (Actor co-occurrence, Amazon-ratings, Twitch-gamers, Pokec), and HyperUFG, a framelet-based hypergraph neural network with low- and high-pass filters as a baseline for heterophilic hypergraph learning.

Problem

Heterophilic hypergraph learning is understudied: existing hypergraph neural networks often underperform MLPs on low-homophily hypergraphs, existing homophily measures are ill-suited for hypergraphs, and few suitable heterophilic hypergraph benchmarks exist.

Approach

Defines hyperedge- and node-level homophily ratios for hypergraphs, builds new large heterophilic hypergraph datasets, and proposes HyperUFG, a spectral framelet hypergraph convolution combining low-pass and high-pass framelet filters with initial residual and identity mapping.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use HyperUFG instead of SheafHyperGNNCora node classification · Coraaccuracy: 81.30 ± 1.70 -> 81.51 ± 0.99Helped
Use HyperUFG instead of SheafHyperGNNCiteseer node classification · Citeseeraccuracy: 74.71 ± 1.23 -> 74.72 ± 2.10No clear effect
Use HyperUFG instead of ED-HNNPubmed node classification · Pubmedaccuracy: 89.03 ± 0.53 -> 88.73 ± 0.42Hurt
Use HyperUFG instead of SheafHyperGNNCora-CA node classification · Cora-CAaccuracy: 85.52 ± 1.28 -> 85.18 ± 0.69Hurt
Use HyperUFG instead of ED-HNNDBLP-CA node classification · DBLP-CAaccuracy: 91.90 ± 0.19 -> 91.67 ± 0.31Hurt
Use HyperUFG instead of HyperNDActor node classification · Actoraccuracy: 92.52 ± 0.81 -> 89.32 ± 0.75Hurt
Use HyperUFG instead of SheafHyperGNNAmazon-ratings node classification · Amazon-ratingsaccuracy: 26.93 ± 3.04 -> 40.53 ± 2.25Helped
Use HyperUFG instead of MLPTwitch-gamers node classification · Twitch-gamersaccuracy: 52.77 ± 1.81 -> 52.35 ± 0.04Hurt
Use HyperUFG instead of ED-HNNPokec node classification · Pokecaccuracy: 59.11 ± 0.57 -> 62.30 ± 0.12Helped
Use HyperUFG instead of SheafHyperGNNSenate node classification · Senateaccuracy: 68.73 ± 4.68 -> 67.61 ± 7.00Hurt
Use HyperUFG instead of SheafHyperGNNHouse node classification · Houseaccuracy: 73.84 ± 2.30 -> 72.82 ± 2.22Hurt
Increase the hyperedge homophily ratioHNNs on synthetic hypergraphs · Synthetic hypergraphsaccuracyHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Actor (co-occurrence) Amazon-ratings Twitch-gamers Pokec Cora Citeseer Pubmed Cora-CA DBLP-CA Senate House Congress

Benchmarks: Actor Amazon-ratings Twitch-gamers Pokec Senate House Cora Citeseer Pubmed Cora-CA DBLP-CA synthetic HSBM hypergraphs

Metrics: node classification accuracy (%) hyperedge homophily node homophily

Baselines: MLP HGNN HyperGCN UniGCNII HyperND AllDeepSets AllSetTransformer ED-HNN SheafHyperGNN

Builds on: HGNN HyperGCN UniGNN ED-HNN GNNs with initial residual and identity mapping (GCNII)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy