atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Kernels and regression theory

When Can We Approximate Wide Contrastive Models with Neural Tangent Kernels and Principal Component Analysis?

AAAI 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Kernels and regression theory · approach: Neural tangent kernel analysis · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Analyzes training dynamics of two-layer wide contrastive networks, showing NTK stays nearly constant under cosine-similarity contrastive losses (not dot-product), and that with orthogonality constraints the learned representations are close to PCA of a random-feature matrix.

Problem

When do trained wide contrastive models behave like kernel methods (fixed NTK) or PCA, given that prior work only showed equivalences at the level of optimization objectives rather than training dynamics?

Approach

Derives NTK and gradient-flow dynamics for two-layer non-linear networks under general contrastive losses; proves NTK constancy up to M^{1/6} steps for cosine similarity but divergence for dot-product similarity; under orthogonality constraints shows the trace-maximization matrix C_V(t) stays close to C_V(0), so representations approximate PCA of a random-feature matrix.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use cosine similarity instead of dot-product similarityWide contrastive networks · MNISTNTK changeHelped
Increase network widthOrthogonality-constrained cosine-similarity model · MNISTFrobenius norm of C_V(t) - C_V(0)Helped
Use PCA on the initial matrix C_V(0) rather than the trained matrix C_V(t)PCA representations · MNISTFractional difference between learned representationsHelped
Use PCA on C_V(0) or fully train the modelRepresentations evaluated with a linear classifier · MNISTDownstream test accuracyNo clear effect
Use iterative PCA and gradient updates instead of full trainingTrace-maximization optimization · MNISTDownstream test accuracyMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MNIST

Benchmarks: MNIST

Metrics: NTK change Frobenius norm of C_V(t)-C_V(0) fractional representation difference downstream linear classifier accuracy

Baselines: PCA on C(0) fully trained contrastive model

Builds on: neural tangent kernel Grassmannian gradient descent InfoNCE SimCLR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy