atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

USDRL: Unified Skeleton-Based Dense Representation Learning with Multi-Grained Feature Decorrelation

AAAI 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Contrastive representation theory · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes USDRL, a non-negative (feature decorrelation) self-supervised framework for skeleton dense representation learning, with multi-grained decorrelation losses over temporal, spatial, and instance domains and a Transformer-based DSTE encoder.

Problem

Self-supervised skeleton-based action representation learning mostly relies on negative-sample contrastive learning (needing momentum encoders/memory banks) and learns global instance-level features that transfer poorly to dense prediction tasks such as action detection.

Approach

Applies feature decorrelation (Barlow Twins/VICReg-style variance, covariance and cross-correlation terms plus intra-sample consistency) at temporal, spatial and instance granularity, combined with a DSTE encoder (DenseShift attention plus convolutional attention) that preserves per-frame and per-joint representations.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add the XC matrix (ablation)USDRL · NTU-60 recognition and retrievalaccuracy: +0.5%Helped
Add multi-grained feature decorrelation (MG-FD) (ablation)DSTE · NTU-60 xsub recognitionaccuracy: 84.6 -> 85.2Helped
Add multi-grained feature decorrelation (MG-FD) (ablation)DSTE · NTU-60 xsub retrievalaccuracy: 74.7 -> 75.0Helped
Use feature decorrelation rather than the negative-based pretraining baseline (ablation)USDRL · NTU-60 recognition and retrievalaccuracy: 74.8 -> 83.7 (recognition); 63.8 -> 73.2 (retrieval)Helped
Use both CA and DSA rather than either module alone (ablation)DSTE · NTU-60 xsub action recognitionaccuracyHelped
Use DSTE instead of STTRUSDRL · PKU-MMD I xsub action detectionmAP_a (%): 66.1 -> 75.7Helped
Use DSTE instead of STTRUSDRL · PKU-MMD I xsub action detectionmAP_v (%): 65.9 -> 74.9Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NTU-RGB+D 60 NTU-RGB+D 120 PKU-MMD I PKU-MMD II

Benchmarks: NTU-RGB+D 60 NTU-RGB+D 120 PKU-MMD I PKU-MMD II

Metrics: top-1 accuracy retrieval accuracy mAP (action and video)

Baselines: MS2L ViA PCM3 GL-Transformer Masked Colorization MAMP AimCLR CMD HaLP HiCo HYSP UmURL

Builds on: Barlow Twins VICReg W-MSE STTR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy