atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Treasures in Discarded Weights for LLM Quantization

AAAI 2025 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: LLM pruning and scaling data · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Discarded Weight Recycling (DWR), a plug-and-play post-quantization step that builds low-rank search spaces around the discarded quantization residual and merges candidates selected by calibration-set perplexity, improving low-bit LLM quantization without extra inference cost.

Problem

Low-bit (INT4/INT3/INT2) weight quantization of LLMs causes significant accuracy loss; existing PTQ methods adjust weights layer-by-layer and ignore global information, and the residual discarded by quantization is unused.

Approach

Treat the discarded weights D = W - Wq as a resource: generate low-rank search spaces around D (random orthogonal, SVD, or AFM/PCA-based) and merge into the quantized weights the candidate that minimizes global calibration-set perplexity, keeping the quantization grid so inference cost is unchanged.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add DWR after GPTQ INT4BLOOM-7B1 · zero-shot commonsense QAAvg. accuracy: 52.32 -> 52.96Helped
Add DWR after GPTQ INT3LLaMA2-7B · MMLU 0-shotAvg. accuracy: 36.44 -> 41.63Helped
Add DWR before QA-LoRA fine-tuningLLaMA2-7B QA-LoRA INT4 · MMLU 0-shotAvg. accuracy: 43.60 -> 45.64Helped
Use random search-space generation (ablation)BLOOM-7B1 GPTQ INT4 + DWR · zero-shot commonsense QAACC.: 52.32 -> 52.49Helped
Use SVD search-space generation (ablation)BLOOM-7B1 GPTQ INT4 + DWR · zero-shot commonsense QAACC.: 52.32 -> 52.65Helped
Replace PPL criterion with direct merging (RTN) (ablation)BLOOM-7B1 GPTQ INT3 + DWR · WikiText2perplexity: 11.97 -> 12.53Hurt
Replace PPL criterion with KL criterion (ablation)BLOOM-7B1 GPTQ INT3 + DWR · WikiText2perplexity: 11.97 -> 12.25Hurt
Vary the calibration sample count, skipped blocks, or search interval (ablation)BLOOM-7B1 GPTQ INT4 + DWR · WikiText2perplexityNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: C4 WikiText2 Flan v2

Benchmarks: WikiText2 C4 BoolQ PIQA SIQA HellaSwag WinoGrande ARC-easy ARC-challenge OpenBookQA MMLU

Metrics: perplexity accuracy

Baselines: GPTQ OmniQuant QA-LoRA RTN merging KL-based criterion LoWC SVD generation random generation

Builds on: GPTQ OmniQuant QA-LoRA AFM (PCA-based compression) AWQ

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy