atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Visual question answering

Towards a Multimodal Large Language Model with Pixel-Level Insight for Biomedicine

AAAI 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Visual question answering · approach: Multimodal LLM question answering

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MedPLIB, an end-to-end biomedical MLLM with pixel-level understanding (VQA, visual prompts, pixel grounding) trained via a multi-stage MoE strategy, and introduces the MeCoVQA dataset.

Problem

Current biomedical MLLMs handle only image-level understanding and text-only interaction, lacking pixel-level prompting and grounding, and pixel-level medical VQA data is scarce.

Approach

Two experts (vision-language and pixel-grounding) are trained separately in multi-stage fashion, then combined as a top-1 routed MoE in the FFN and fine-tuned with LoRA, with a LISA-style SEG token driving a SAM-Med2D mask decoder and region tokens for visual prompts.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace standard FFN with MoE (ablation)MedPLIB · Ablation evaluation (four datasets)Mean: 51.62 -> 54.24Helped
add Stage I alignment to Stage IV training (ablation)MedPLIB · Ablation evaluation (four datasets)Mean: 54.24 -> 54.42Helped
initialize Stage IV with the Stage II vision-language expert (ablation)MedPLIB · Ablation evaluation (four datasets)Mean: 54.42 -> 54.53Helped
initialize Stage IV with the Stage III grounding expert (ablation)MedPLIB · Ablation evaluation (four datasets)Mean: 54.42 -> 54.91Helped
add both Stage II recognition and Stage III grounding expert initialization (ablation)MedPLIB · Ablation evaluation (four datasets)Mean: 54.24 -> 56.83Helped
use top-2 dense routing instead of top-1 sparse routing (ablation)MedPLIB · Ablation evaluationperformanceHurt
set Capacity Factor to 1.5 rather than 1 or 2 (ablation)MedPLIB · Ablation evaluationperformanceHelped
add pixel grounding capability alongside VQAMedPLIB · MeCoVQA-C Testrecall: 52.83 -> 49.41Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LLaVA-Med-alignment SLAKE PathVQA PMC-VQA ImageClef2021 ImageClef2019 VQA-RAD SA-Med2D-20M OmniMedVQA

Benchmarks: OmniMedVQA MeCoVQA-C MeCoVQA-R MeCoVQA-G

Metrics: accuracy precision recall mDice

Baselines: MiniGPT-4 BLIP-2 InstructBLIP LLaVA VPGTrans RadFM LLaVA-Med LISA LViT ReclMIS LAVT DMMI

Builds on: LISA LLaVA LLaVA-Med SAM-Med2D MoE-LLaVA

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy