atlas

Research map / Image generation / Image restoration

Single Exposure Quantitative Phase Imaging with a Conventional Microscope Using Diffusion Models

AAAI 2025 · Image generation › Image restoration · approach: Reflection removal · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes single-exposure quantitative phase imaging by using chromatic aberration in a white-light brightfield microscope with an RGB camera, and a Zero-Mean Diffusion model trained on synthetic data to recover phase.

Problem

Transport-of-Intensity Equation (TIE) phase retrieval normally needs multiple through-focus acquisitions, which is impractical in clinical settings; polychromatic illumination introduces a fixed small defocus and blur that conventional TIE solvers handle poorly.

Approach

Use chromatic aberration of white light and an RGB camera to obtain a single-exposure through-focus-like stack, then solve phase with a conditional diffusion model (Zero-Mean Diffusion) that diffuses residuals around a learned mean predictor, rather than normalizing data to [-1,1], with a theoretical upper-bound argument favoring the centered process.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ZMD (p) instead of MP (p) (ablation)phase reconstruction · Synthetic HCOCOMS-SSIM: 0.95 $\pm$ 0.02 -> 0.97 $\pm$ 0.02Helped
Add the ZMD residual diffusion prediction to Mean Prediction (ablation)phase reconstruction · Synthetic HCOCOMAE: 0.06 $\pm$ 0.02 -> 0.06 $\pm$ 0.02No clear effect
Add the ZMD residual diffusion prediction to Mean Prediction (ablation)phase reconstruction · Through-Focus Brightfield, samples 1–4MS-SSIM: 0.78 -> 0.82; 0.88 -> 0.89; 0.83 -> 0.88; 0.84 -> 0.86Helped
Add the ZMD residual diffusion prediction to Mean Prediction (ablation)phase reconstruction · Through-Focus Brightfield, samples 1–4MAE: 0.09 -> 0.08; 0.06 -> 0.05; 0.10 -> 0.10; 0.09 -> 0.09Mixed
Use ZMD (p) instead of the strongest non-ZMD methodphase reconstruction · Through-Focus Brightfield red blood cells, sample 1MS-SSIM: 0.90 -> 0.80Hurt
Use ZMD (p) instead of MP (p) (ablation)phase reconstruction · Through-Focus Brightfield red blood cells, sample 2MS-SSIM: 0.78 -> 0.83Helped
Use ZMD (p) instead of MP (p) (ablation)phase reconstruction · Through-Focus Brightfield red blood cells, sample 3MS-SSIM: 0.88 -> 0.90Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet HCOCO UTI clinical urine microscopy dataset

Benchmarks: HCOCO synthetic images through-focus brightfield urine and red blood cell stacks UTI clinical microscopy dataset

Metrics: MS-SSIM MAE

Baselines: US TIE (2-shot) US TIE (polychromatic) Mean Prediction regression model

Builds on: Conditional Variational Diffusion Models Transport-of-Intensity Equation US TIE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy