atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Argument Mining from Speech: Detecting Claims in Political Debates

AAAI 2016 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: Text generation and evaluation metrics · 71 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add MFCC audio features to text features (ablation)SVM on ground-truth transcript · UK 2015 debate, CameronF1: 55.2 -> 61.2Helped
add MFCC audio features to text features (ablation)SVM on ground-truth transcript · UK 2015 debate, CleggF1: 50.6 -> 59.0Helped
add MFCC audio features to text features (ablation)SVM on ground-truth transcript · UK 2015 debate, MilibandF1: 58.7 -> 62.5Helped
add MFCC audio features to text features (ablation)SVM on Google Speech transcript · UK 2015 debate, CameronF1: 48.2 -> 52.6Helped
add MFCC audio features to text features (ablation)SVM on Google Speech transcript · UK 2015 debate, CleggF1: 50.5 -> 52.5Helped
add MFCC audio features to text features (ablation)SVM on Google Speech transcript · UK 2015 debate, MilibandF1: 31.3 -> 29.3Hurt
use ASR (Google Speech) transcript instead of ground-truth transcript (ablation)SVM claim detection · UK 2015 debate, MilibandF1: 58.7 -> 31.3Hurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy