atlas

Research map / Bandits and online learning / Online convex optimization and games

Regret Analysis of Multi-task Representation Learning for Linear-Quadratic Adaptive Control

AAAI 2025 · Bandits and online learning › Online convex optimization and games · approach: Online decision-making with feedback structure · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Analyzes regret of a shared-representation certainty-equivalent LQR algorithm for H linear systems whose dynamics lie in a common dtheta-dimensional basis, giving sqrt(T/H) regret under benign exploration and sqrt(du·dtheta)·sqrt(T) + T^{3/4}/H^{1/5} under difficult exploration.

Problem

Online adaptive linear-quadratic control of many related linear systems that share an unknown low-dimensional dynamics basis; prior regret guarantees for adaptive control are single-agent and static for representation learning.

Approach

Combines certainty-equivalent adaptive LQR with a de-biased, feature-whitened (DFW) federated representation update across agents, replacing least squares for the shared basis, and characterizes regret in benign vs. difficult exploration regimes.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
share a learned representation across agents rather than learning each system independentlyAdaptive LQR · Easily identifiable multi-task settingregret: \tilde \calO\paren{ \sqrt{\frac{T}{H}}} vs. \calO(\sqrt{\dx\du^2 T})Helped
share a learned representation across agents rather than learning each system independentlyAdaptive LQR · Not easily identifiable multi-task settingregret: \tilde \calO \paren{\sqrt{\du \dtheta }\sqrt{T} + \frac{T^{3/4}}{H^{1/5 }}} vs. \calO(\sqrt{\dx\du^2 T})Mixed
increase the number of communicating tasks from $H = 25$ to $H = 100$Shared-Representation Certainty-Equivalent Control with Continual Exploration · Cartpole, easily identifiable, nominal task h = 1regretHelped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: simulated cartpole linearized dynamics

Benchmarks: simulated multi-cartpole LQR regret

Metrics: expected regret vs timesteps T regret scaling with number of tasks H

Baselines: fully-unknown single-agent certainty-equivalent control

Builds on: DFW (de-bias and feature whiten) certainty-equivalent adaptive LQR least squares system identification minimax single-task LQR regret

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy