Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs
Verb Mirage: Unveiling and Assessing Verb Concept Hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Introduces a verb-hallucination benchmark built from HICO and CharadesEgo for MLLMs, shows severe verb hallucination and failure of existing mitigation methods, and proposes LoRA fine-tuning of LLaVA-V1.5 on a verb-rich Pangea-derived instruction set.
Problem
MLLMs hallucinate about verb/action concepts, a category largely ignored by object-focused hallucination benchmarks and mitigation methods.
Approach
Builds verb-focused YN and MC probes by altering verbs while holding objects fixed, evaluates many MLLMs under varied conditions (object reference, image distortion, egocentric view, rare verbs, ambiguity), and mitigates via LoRA fine-tuning on 60K verb-rich Pangea-derived samples.
Key results
- Fine-tuning LLaVA V1.5 with LoRA on Pangea-derived verb data raises YN w/ obj accuracy from 52.16 to 78.48 and MC w/o obj accuracy from 51.00 to 60.79.
- Training-free mitigation methods (OPERA, VCD, Nullu) show marginal, inconsistent, or negative effects on verb hallucination.
- Visual pepper-salt noise degrades verb understanding more than object understanding, with lower error consistency for verb questions.
Surprising findings
- Training-free methods OPERA and VCD fail to reduce verb hallucination, and VCD's KL divergence is zero on most samples, suggesting heavy reliance on language prior.
- LLaVA V1.5 achieves higher mAP (68.41) than HICO-finetuned CLIP (60.45) despite severe verb hallucination in YN/MC accuracy, indicating miscalibration rather than lack of verb knowledge.
Limitations
- Fine-tuned model still far from satisfactory on verb hallucination.
- Transitive verbs mean object influence cannot be fully removed from benchmarks.
- Pangea labels are rough action labels, limiting the verb supervision quality.
Experimental setup
Datasets: HICO CharadesEgo Pangea POPE
Benchmarks: HICO-based verb benchmark CharadesEgo-based verb benchmark MMMU MathVista
Metrics: accuracy precision recall F1 mAP Cohen's kappa error consistency
Baselines: OPERA VCD Nullu REVERIE Haloquest Octopus LLaVA V1.5
Builds on: POPE OPERA VCD Nullu Pangea
Closest papers by meaning
- In-Context Sharpness as Alerts: An Inner Representation Perspective for Hallucination Mitigation (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.90)
- ANAH-v2: Scaling Analytical Hallucination Annotation of Large Language Models (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.89)
- MIRAGE: Assessing Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Chains of MLLM (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- Combating Multimodal LLM Hallucination via Bottom-Up Holistic Reasoning (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- The Mirage of Performance Gains: Why Contrastive Decoding Fails to Mitigate Object Hallucinations in MLLMs? (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- Hallucination Augmented Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.89)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
