atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Uncertainty and Gaussian processes

REPEAT: Improving Uncertainty Estimation in Representation Learning Explainability

AAAI 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Uncertainty and Gaussian processes · approach: Epistemic versus aleatoric decomposition · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes REPEAT, an R-XAI method that treats each pixel's importance as a Bernoulli variable obtained by repeatedly thresholding stochastic RELAX importance maps, yielding importance and certainty estimates.

Problem

Existing representation learning XAI (R-XAI) uncertainty estimates measure variability in importance scores rather than whether a pixel is certainly important or not.

Approach

Model each pixel as a Bernoulli random variable (important vs unimportant) by thresholding repeated stochastic R-XAI importance maps with histogram-based (mean) thresholding; importance is the estimated probability and uncertainty is p(1-p).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use REPEAT uncertainty estimates instead of RELAXR-XAI uncertainty estimation · PASCAL-VOC and MS-COCO, ResNet50 and ViTeMPRT: -0.08 -> 0.48; -0.10 -> 0.13; -0.08 -> 0.44; -0.08 -> 0.13Helped
use REPEAT uncertainty estimates instead of Integrated Gradients uncertainty estimatesOOD detection · PASCAL-VOC and MS-COCO vs EuroSAT, ResNet50AUROC: 0.998 -> 1.000; 0.999 -> 1.000Helped
use REPEAT uncertainty estimates instead of baseline uncertainty estimatesOOD detection · PASCAL-VOC and MS-COCO vs EuroSAT, ViTAUROC: 0.002 -> 0.973; 0.002 -> 0.939Helped
use REPEAT uncertainty estimates instead of the strongest baseline estimatesuncertainty estimation · PASCAL-VOC and MS-COCO, ResNet50 and ViTuncertainty complexity: 10.41 -> 9.97; 10.46 -> 9.99; 10.35 -> 9.91; 10.40 -> 9.94Helped
use Kernel SHAP instead of RELAX as the base stochastic R-XAI method (ablation)REPEAT · PASCAL-VOC and MS-COCO vs EuroSAT, ResNet50 and ViTAUROC: 0.999 vs 1.000; 0.999 vs 0.973; 1.000 vs 1.000; 1.000 vs 0.939No clear effect
use Kernel SHAP instead of RELAX as the base stochastic R-XAI method (ablation)REPEAT · PASCAL-VOC and MS-COCO, ResNet50 and ViTuncertainty complexity: 9.97 -> 10.40; 9.99 -> 10.36; 9.91 -> 10.28; 9.94 -> 10.28Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PASCAL VOC MS-COCO EuroSAT FashionMNIST ImageNet

Benchmarks: PASCAL VOC MS-COCO

Metrics: eMPRT sanity check score AUROC for OOD detection entropy-based complexity

Baselines: RELAX Saliency Guided Backpropagation Integrated Gradients Kernel SHAP

Builds on: RELAX Label-Free Feature Importance Kernel SHAP Test-time augmentation eMPRT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy