atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Visual question answering

A Novel Framework for Robustness Analysis of Visual QA Models

AAAI 2019 · Vision-language and multimodal › Visual question answering · approach: Universal VQA models · 31 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Append increasingly lower-ranked groups of three GBQD questions to each main questionVQA models evaluated with the proposed sparse-combination ranking · VQA test-dev, GBQD partitions 1–7accuracy: 60.16 -> 49.96Hurt
Use sparse-combination ranking instead of direct similarity metrics to construct GBQDVQA robustness evaluation · VQA test-dev, GBQD partitions 1–7monotonicity of accuracy across noise levelsHelped
Use lower-ranked GBQD question groups as added noiseVQA models · VQA test-dev, GBQD partitions 1–7accuracy: 60.16 -> 45.57Hurt
Evaluate robustness using YNBQD rather than GBQDVQA models · VQA test-dev, YNBQD versus GBQDrobustness scoreMixed
Use attention-based models rather than non-attentive modelsVQA models · VQA test-dev, GBQDrobustness scoreHelped
Use MUTAN without Attention instead of MUTAN with AttentionMUTAN · VQA test-dev, YNBQDrobustness scoreHelped
Use BLEU, ROUGE, CIDEr, or METEOR ranking instead of sparse-combination rankingVQA robustness evaluation · VQA test-dev, GBQDaccuracy trend across noise levelsHurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy