atlas

Research map / Large language models / Retrieval and knowledge

Generating Distractors for Reading Comprehension Questions from Real Examinations

AAAI 2019 · Large language models › Retrieval and knowledge · approach: Explanatory and multiple-choice QA benchmarks

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use hierarchical encoding with sentence-level structure instead of flat Seq2Seq encodingRACE distractor generation · RACE distractor generation test, averageBLEU4: 3.92 -> 4.77Helped
Add static attention to modulate dynamic hierarchical attention (ablation)HRED · RACE distractor generation test, averageBLEU4: 4.77 -> 5.21Helped
Add static attention to modulate dynamic hierarchical attention (ablation)HRED · RACE distractor generation human evaluation# Selected: 108 -> 124Helped
Use the proposed static and dynamic attention model instead of Seq2SeqRACE distractor generation · RACE distractor generation test, averageROUGE1: 13.87 -> 15.13Helped
Use the proposed static and dynamic attention model instead of Seq2SeqRACE distractor generation · RACE distractor generation human evaluation# Selected: 96 -> 124Helped
Select later distractors using a Jaccard distance threshold of 0.5Beam-search distractor generation · RACE distractor generation test, first versus second distractorBLEU4: 6.47 -> 4.85Hurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy