atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Kernels and regression theory

Optimal Control Operator Perspective and a Neural Adaptive Spectral Method

AAAI 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Kernels and regression theory · approach: Generalization theory of deep networks · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a one-pass instance-to-control-function operator learner (NCO) implemented by the Neural Adaptive Spectral Method (NASM), a neural operator with adaptive basis and time-dependent coefficients, with approximation error bounds and experiments on synthetic control systems and a real planar pushing dataset.

Problem

Solving optimal control problems efficiently and reusably without known dynamics, iterative optimization at test time, or discretization-limited control functions; existing two-phase neural solvers suffer from inconsistency and distribution shift.

Approach

Treat OCP solving as learning an instance-to-control operator and implement it with NASM, a generalized spectral method whose coefficients depend on both instance and time and whose basis functions are adaptively parameterized by the instance and time, enabling single-pass, continuous-time control outputs.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use NASM instead of DMQuadrotor control · QuadrotorTime (sec./instance): 9.23 \times 10^{-2} -> 6.50 \times 10^{-5}Helped
use NASM instead of the strongest neural baseline, DONQuadrotor control · QuadrotorID MAPE: 4.09 \times 10^{-5} -> 6.17 \times 10^{-6}Helped
use NASM instead of PDPQuadrotor control · QuadrotorOOD MAPE: 1.16 \times 10^{-4} -> 1.21 \times 10^{-4}Mixed
use NASM instead of DONPushing control · PushingID MAPE: 0.117 (\pm 0.006) -> 0.108 (\pm 0.006)Helped
use NASM instead of DONPushing control · PushingOOD MAPE: 0.134 (\pm 0.008) -> 0.137 (\pm 0.007)Hurt
add adaptive basis parameters (ablation)NASM · QuadrotorID MAPE: 7.86 \times 10^{-6} -> 6.17 \times 10^{-6}Helped
add non-static, time-dependent coefficients (ablation)NASM · QuadrotorOOD MAPE: 5.83 \times 10^{-4} -> 1.21 \times 10^{-4}Helped
replace adaptive basis and non-static coefficients with a fixed Fourier basis and static coefficients (ablation)NASM · QuadrotorID MAPE: 6.17 \times 10^{-6} -> 9.59 \times 10^{-2}Hurt
replace adaptive Fourier basis with adaptive Chebyshev basis (ablation)NASM · QuadrotorID MAPE: 6.17 \times 10^{-6} -> 6.36 \times 10^{-6}No clear effect
replace summation with neural aggregation (ablation)NASM · QuadrotorID MAPE: 6.17 \times 10^{-6} -> 7.13 \times 10^{-6}Hurt
replace MLP backbone with a convolutional backbone (ablation)NASM · QuadrotorOOD MAPE: 1.21 \times 10^{-4} -> 4.95 \times 10^{-3}Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Synthetic control systems (Quadrotor and others) generated with Direct Method solutions Pushing dataset (ABB IRB 120 real-world robot pushing)

Benchmarks: Quadrotor (ID/OOD MAPE) Synthetic control systems ID/OOD benchmarks Pushing dataset ID/OOD MAPE

Metrics: MAPE inference time per instance

Baselines: Direct Method (IPOPT) PDP DeepONet MLP FNO GEN SNO

Builds on: DeepONet Fourier Neural Operator Spectral Neural Operator Pontryagin Differentiable Programming

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy