atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Understanding the Disharmony between Weight Normalization Family and Weight Decay

AAAI 2020 · Optimization › Implicit bias and generalization · approach: Explicit and implicit regularization interplay · 10 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace fixed weight decay with AWS on WS convolutionsWS-ResNet50 SGD · ImageNet valtop-1 accuracy: 76.74 -> 76.59No clear effect
replace fixed weight decay with AWS on WS convolutionsWS-ResNeXt-101 SGD · ImageNet valtop-1 accuracy: 78.68 -> 78.74No clear effect
use AWS instead of fixed weight decay under Adam (WS)WS-ResNet50 · ImageNet valtraining stability / top-1: failed (–) -> 72.55Helped
use AWS instead of fixed weight decay with large decay valuesWS-ResNet50 SGD · ImageNet valtraining stability: – -> 72.15 (alpha 1e-1)Helped
remove weight decay (lambda=0) on WS convolutions (ablation)WS-ResNet50 · ImageNet traintop-1 accuracyHurt
scale initial weights by 20 or 100 with fixed WD (ablation)WS-ResNet50 · ImageNettop-1 accuracyHurt
use AWS instead of fixed WD under scaled initialization (ablation)WS-ResNet50 · ImageNettop-1 accuracyHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy