atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Matrix and tensor methods

On the Trainability and Classical Simulability of Learning Matrix Product States Variationally

AAAI 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Matrix and tensor methods · approach: Geometry of low-rank and SPD structure · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proves that MPS ansatz training with global observables suffers cost concentration and barren plateaus while local observables avoid them, and provides numerical evidence of effective subspaces suggesting classical simulability.

Problem

Trainability of variational learning of weakly entangled quantum state approximations with the matrix product state (MPS) ansatz, and whether such trainable objectives are classically simulable with few quantum resources.

Approach

Rigorous Haar-integration proofs for the MPS ansatz built from unitary 2-design subcircuits showing global-observable fidelity costs concentrate exponentially while local-observable costs are lower bounded linearly in n; plus a C-K norm to numerically detect effective subspaces in the Pauli basis.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use a global observable instead of local observables (ablation)MPS ansatz for state approximation · State approximation (global observable)objective-function varianceHurt
Use local observables instead of a global observable (ablation)MPS ansatz for state approximation · State approximation (local observables)objective-function varianceHelped
Use a global observable instead of local observables (ablation)MPS ansatz for state approximation · State approximation (global observable)partial-derivative varianceHurt
Use local observables instead of a global observable (ablation)MPS ansatz for state approximation · State approximation (local observables)partial-derivative varianceHelped
Increase subcircuit width from k = 2 to k = 3 or k = 4 (ablation)MPS ansatz optimized with SPSA · State approximation, n = 12infidelityHurt
Use local observables instead of global observables (ablation)MPS ansatz · Random HEA-generated input statesobjective-function second momentHelped
Use local observables instead of global observables (ablation)MPS ansatz · Pauli-basis effective-subspace analysisC-Pn normHelped
Move the 1-local Pauli Z component closer to the last qubitMPS ansatz with local observable |0⟩⟨0|16 · 16-qubit simulationPauli probabilityHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: variance of objective function variance of partial derivatives infidelity C-K norm second moment

Baselines: Global observable MPS training Hardware Efficient Ansatz with local observables QCNN with local observables

Builds on: Cerezo et al. 2021 barren plateaus with local vs global cost Cerezo et al. 2024 effective subspaces conjecture Ben-Dov et al. 2022 MPS state approximation Liu et al. 2022 tensor network barren plateaus

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy