atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph algorithms and clustering

How Many Pairwise Preferences Do We Need to Rank a Graph Consistently?

AAAI 2019 · Graph learning › Graph algorithms and clustering · approach: Graph comparison and random features · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use PR-Kron or PR-PD instead of the compared methodsGraph ranking · Synthetic graphspairwise 0-1 lossHelped
Use PR-Kron or PR-PD instead of the compared methodsGraph ranking · Heart, Fourclass, Vehicle, Vowel, House, Mgpairwise 0-1 lossHelped
Use Rank Centrality or Inductive Pairwise Ranking instead of graph-locality-based methodsGraph ranking · Synthetic graphspairwise 0-1 lossHurt
Use Rank Centrality or Inductive Pairwise Ranking instead of graph-locality-based methodsGraph ranking · Real-world datasetspairwise 0-1 lossHurt
Apply full ranking rather than bipartite rankingGraph ranking · Real-world datasetspairwise 0-1 lossHurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy