AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Sample complexity

Which Factorization Machine Modeling Is Better: A Theoretical Answer with Optimal Guarantee

AAAI 2019 · Learning theory and algorithms › Sample complexity · approach: Coresets and sublinear estimation · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace conventional FM's PSD factorization with decoupled factors while retaining zero diagonalFM · vTEC evaluation averageRMSE: 0.01617 -> 0.01599Helped
Replace conventional FM's PSD factorization with decoupled factors while retaining zero diagonalFM · vTEC evaluation averageRTK ratio: 63.10% -> 64.44%Helped
Replace conventional FM with iFMFM · vTEC TestDay1, TestDay2, TestDay3, TestDay4, TestDay5, TestDay6, TestDay7, TestDay8, TestDay9RMSEMixed
Remove the PSD constraint, allowing negative second-order patternsFM · Synthetic data with flipped labels and mixed-sign eigenvaluesRMSEHelped
Keep the diagonal-zero constraint while removing the PSD constraintGeneralized FM · Sub-gaussian datasampling complexity: O(k^{2}d\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(kd)/\tau^{2}) -> O(kd\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(kd))Helped
Remove the PSD constraintConventional FM · Sub-gaussian datasampling complexityNo clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy